mirror of
https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills.git
synced 2026-09-11 19:47:12 +03:00
docs(research-methodology): add when-not-to-use negative boundary
Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933558+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
factory-droid[bot] <138933558+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parent
2c7c0d59ea
commit
78dc36e5e8
@@ -19,6 +19,17 @@ Professional research process for a subagent. Three tracks based on the type of
|
||||
|
||||
All three share the same lifecycle (Scope → Gather → Evaluate → Analyze → Synthesize → Report) but differ in evidence standards, speed, and output format.
|
||||
|
||||
## When not to use
|
||||
|
||||
Do **not** load this skill for:
|
||||
|
||||
- A single factual lookup or a quick answer — respond directly; a full research lifecycle adds cost without adding credibility.
|
||||
- Direct implementation work that needs no investigation — build and verify the change instead (`backend-engineering`, `frontend-engineering`).
|
||||
- Operating a specific retrieval or capture tool — load that tool's skill for runbook-level configuration and diagnostics.
|
||||
- Raw capture of web content without evaluation or synthesis — the capture tool's own skill covers fetching; this skill starts where source evaluation begins.
|
||||
- Structuring already-gathered findings into durable summaries, analysis files, and evidence dossiers — use `artifact-pyramids` for the output architecture.
|
||||
- Persisting captured sources into durable notes across a repeated research-to-note sequence — use `research-and-vault`.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Research Lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user