Files
Magnus HedemarkandGitHub 22d141de75 feat: add research-grounded technical project management skill (#468)
* feat: add research-grounded technical project management skill

* test: retain isolated project coordination regression evidence
2026-09-04 23:56:40 -04:00

1.5 KiB

Project brief

Project: [name] · As of: [date] · State: [proposed / authorized / paused / closed] Authoritative records: [links and versions]

Outcome and authority

  • Why this project exists: [problem/outcome]
  • Success and acceptance evidence: [observable criteria, evaluator]
  • Sponsor / funding authority: [accepted role/person]
  • Delivery coordinator: [accepted owner and delegated decisions]
  • Technical, product, and risk decisions: [respective authorities]
  • Scope included / excluded: [boundaries]
  • Approval record or missing authorization: [source; do not infer approval]

Constraints and assumptions

Constraint Hard or negotiable? Source Consequence / decision owner
[date, budget, quality, capacity, obligation] [classification] [evidence] [effect]

Capacity: [availability by capability; operations, leave and part-time constraints] Dependencies: [link to existing plan and critical handoffs] Uncertainty: [known gaps, validation owner, next learning decision]

Working agreement

Selected approach and rationale: [link to approach decision if needed] Source of truth: [where scope, milestones, decisions and evidence live] Review rhythm: [smallest useful cadence; audience; decision purpose] Escalation triggers and authority: [agreed tolerances, not invented percentages] Next milestone: [acceptance evidence, forecast, commitment if accepted] Next action or decision: [owner acceptance or explicit gap; due/review trigger]