Files
magnus919_agent-skills/data-scientist/references/interpretability-sources.md
T
Magnus HedemarkandGitHub 4ea078ec7e feat(data-scientist): strengthen interpretation evidence (#501)
* feat(skill): add interpretability workflow

* fix(data-scientist): make the causal route clickable

* docs(data-scientist): list all interpretation resources
2026-09-14 16:51:20 -04:00

1.2 KiB

Interpretability sources

Primary sources inform method choice; none establishes a universal explanation quality threshold.

Source Use
Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin, “Why Should I Trust You?” (LIME), KDD 2016, https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778 Local surrogate explanations and locality assumptions.
Lundberg and Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions” (SHAP), NeurIPS 2017, https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html Additive attribution framing; implementation and dependence assumptions must be checked.
Adebayo et al., “Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps,” NeurIPS 2018, https://papers.nips.cc/paper/8160-sanity-checks-for-saliency-maps Parameter/data randomization checks for some saliency methods.
Molnar, Interpretable Machine Learning, https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ Living reference for method assumptions and limitations; verify cited methods against original papers.
Mitchell et al., “Model Cards for Model Reporting,” FAT* 2019, https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596 Documentation of intended use, performance, and subgroup limitations.