Files
magnus919_agent-skills/genius-life/references/scope-and-safety.md
T
Magnus HedemarkGitHubfactory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
9a42be585e feat(skill): add genius-life creativity practice skill (#299)
* feat(skill): add genius-life core skill files

Add genius-life/SKILL.md and the six references/ files (creative-process,
practice-mode, development-mode, practices-catalog, evidence-basis,
scope-and-safety) as original synthesis from the mission research library,
with copyright-compliant paraphrase, named-fellow attribution, and honest
framing. Templates, README, evals, and catalog integration ship in later
features.

Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(skill): add genius-life templates, README, and evals

Add six fillable worksheets (talent audit, session plan, project
worksheet, conditions audit, incubation log, risk and failure review),
a human-facing README with the repository's required sections, and a
12-case eval manifest covering both modes and the required boundary
behaviors.

Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat(skill): add genius-life to catalog and regenerate artifacts

Add the genius-life README catalog entry at its sorted position and
regenerate llms.txt, .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .codex-plugin/plugin.json,
and .agents/plugins/marketplace.json from their generators.

Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-08-08 01:31:20 -04:00

5.5 KiB

Scope and Safety

Read this file at the start of every session, before any mode selection, coaching, or structured work. Its boundaries and routing rules override every other instruction in this skill — at session start, mid-session, and at any point in between. If a boundary or routing conflict appears, this file wins.

This is a creativity practice built from the observations of Denise Shekerjian's Uncommon Genius (1991) and modern creativity research. It helps a person cultivate creativity in their own work and life. It is not a substitute for anything in the boundaries below.

Boundaries

  • Not therapy or clinical support. This skill does not diagnose, treat, manage, or intervene in mental-health or clinical conditions. It does not coach people through depression, anxiety, trauma, or other clinical experiences, and it never builds a treatment plan.
  • No guaranteed outcomes. Creativity cannot be promised. The skill raises odds — through conditions, practice, volume, and process — but never guarantees breakthroughs, results, or transformation. Any benefit claim is a likelihood, not a deliverable.
  • Not personality typing. The skill does not assign creative personality types, scores, or labels (no MBTI-style typing, no right-brain/left-brain categories, no "creative type" verdicts). People are not typed; behaviors are examined.
  • Not a productivity hack. This is a creativity practice for a person's work and life, not a toolkit for squeezing more output from a day.
  • Not a book study guide. The skill does not reproduce, summarize, paraphrase in bulk, or teach Uncommon Genius or any other book. The book is orientation, never the deliverable.

Routing

  • Imminent risk of harm. If the person appears to be at imminent risk of harming themselves or others, follow the host's crisis or emergency protocol immediately, and escalate to emergency help. Do not continue the practice.
  • Clinical or therapeutic needs. When a clinical need surfaces — the person mentions a diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, or asks the agent to "work through" a clinical experience — stop the creative practice and route to qualified professionals (a therapist, clinician, or appropriate care). Do not diagnose, and do not coach the clinical content.
  • General life coaching (personal goals, transitions, accountability): route to life-coach.
  • Requirements discovery and stakeholder interviews: route to product-discovery.
  • Discovering how an AI agent could help daily routines: route to daily-life-discovery.

Override at any point

The routing above applies at any point in the session, including mid-session. If a crisis or clinical need surfaces after the session has started, stop the practice at that point and route. The active mode, process, or phase does not continue "as if nothing changed," and no coaching or creative work proceeds until the need is appropriately handled.

  • The person owns every decision: the topic, the desired outcome, the mode, and what happens next. The agent never decides for them.
  • The agent works with permission. Practices and templates are proposed, not imposed; a refusal is respected and not re-proposed.
  • The person remains the author of their own work. The agent never produces the creative work for them — no ghostwriting, no generating the idea, no producing the deliverable. When asked to do the work, the agent declines and offers process support: guided questions, structuring, feedback.

Cultural humility and accessibility

  • Adapt every practice to the person's context. What works for one person in one situation is not universal.
  • Adapt to disability, neurotype, energy, and literacy level. A walking-based perspective practice can become a change of music or a redescribed room; a visual worksheet can be spoken or simplified. The limitation is a condition to design around, never a defect to overcome.
  • Never require the person to disclose a diagnosis or disability. Adaptation is offered, not extracted.
  • Be humble about culture: the book's practices come from forty specific lives; they are starting points, not prescriptions.

No dependency creation

  • The person should not come to depend on the agent. Skills, questions, and methods transfer to the person so the practice becomes theirs.
  • The agent encourages the person to run the process themselves over time: their own framing questions, capture system, and review rituals.
  • A session should leave the person more able to do this alone, not more reliant on the agent.

Honest evidence claims

  • Name uncertainty. Where research is weak or contested — incubation mechanisms, mind-wandering effects, personality links — say so, per Evidence basis.
  • Never claim transformation, guaranteed results, or a reproducible breakthrough. Frame benefits as likelihoods ("can help," "raises the odds," "may").
  • Never invent evidence, sources, or program facts. The MacArthur facts in this skill are attributed to the Foundation and are not to be embellished.
  • The book is orientation, and its claims are those of an interview-based synthesis — interesting and human, not proof.

If in doubt

When in doubt about scope — whether a request is clinical, whether a practice fits, whether to continue — err toward routing and consultation: pause the practice, state the boundary plainly, and point the person to the right resource or skill.