mirror of
https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills.git
synced 2026-09-21 08:36:33 +03:00
Magnus HedemarkandGitHub
def688dc1e
* feat: add gap-analysis methodology skill Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: satisfy gap-analysis trigger validation Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * chore: refresh generated marketplace metadata Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * chore: refresh llms catalog Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> --------- Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me>
2.6 KiB
2.6 KiB
Source Index
Accessed 2026-09-07. Sources are retained as pointers and claims are paraphrased in original language. Vendor and consultancy pages are not used as normative authority.
| ID | Source | Authority/type | Supports | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | ASQ Quality Glossary | Professional quality body | Concise definition: compare current condition with desired state; baseline/data tools | Short definition, not a full method |
| S2 | NIST CSF 2.0 and components | U.S. standards agency | Current/Target Profiles, risk-informed outcomes, prioritized implementation; tiers are not necessarily maturity levels | Cybersecurity-specific; voluntary framework |
| S3 | NIST SP 1301 | U.S. standards agency | Profile creation and current/target comparison workflow | Cybersecurity-specific |
| S4 | GAO-15-223 | U.S. government audit/evaluation body | Data-driven gap identification, programmatic-impact prioritization, stakeholder consultation, metric consistency | Federal workforce case; recommendations are context-bound |
| S5 | CDC needs analysis | U.S. public health agency | Tie the assessment goal to program outcomes and describe gaps as outcomes not occurring | Training/needs-assessment context |
| S6 | AHRQ/NCBI research-gap framework | U.S. evidence-synthesis method | Characterize where evidence falls short and why: insufficient/imprecise, biased, inconsistent/unknown, not right information; distinguish gaps from decision-relevant needs | Research evidence context, not organizational maturity |
| S7 | AHRQ Gap Analysis Facilitator's Guide | U.S. health quality agency | Document review, focus groups, structured interviews, priorities, report template | Healthcare program context |
| S8 | UK National Archives Gap Analysis Study | Government archive | Worked public-sector gap-analysis example | Source should be rechecked if used for a specific current claim |
Do not cite S2-S7 as if they establish one universal gap-analysis standard. They are complementary examples of a recurring method in different domains.