Revert critique sub-agent over-engineering, add Codex spawning guidance

Reverts Codex's overly bureaucratic sub-agent delegation changes (permission
prompts, "not fully compliant" disclaimers) back to clear, practical language.
Uses RFC-style SHOULD for sub-agent delegation with named examples for both
Claude Code (Agent tool) and Codex (natural language spawning).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Bakaus
2026-04-02 20:29:18 -07:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6
parent 03a4433dcc
commit 99bc9d48ad
11 changed files with 33 additions and 11 deletions
+3 -1
View File
@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ Invoke /impeccable -- it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the **Co
Launch two independent assessments. **Neither must see the other's output** to avoid bias.
If your system supports sub-agents (e.g., Claude Code's Agent tool), delegate each assessment to a separate agent. The sub-agents should return their findings as structured text -- do NOT output findings to the user yet. If sub-agents are not available, complete each assessment sequentially, writing findings to internal notes before proceeding.
You SHOULD delegate each assessment to a separate sub-agent for independence. Use your environment's agent spawning mechanism -- e.g., Claude Code's `Agent` tool, or Codex's subagent spawning ("spawn two agents in parallel"). Sub-agents should return their findings as structured text -- do NOT output findings to the user yet.
If sub-agents are not available in the current environment, complete each assessment sequentially, writing findings to internal notes before proceeding.
**Tab isolation**: When browser automation is available, each assessment MUST create its own new tab -- never reuse an existing tab, even if one is already open at the correct URL. This prevents the two assessments from interfering with each other's page state.