mirror of
https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable.git
synced 2026-09-11 21:57:14 +03:00
Release: skill v4.1.3
AI-assisted release preparation under maintainer direction.
This commit is contained in:
Paul Bakaus
@@ -16,74 +16,23 @@ When the parent hands you a decision card packet instead of an approved mock, th
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Contract
|
||||
|
||||
Expect:
|
||||
Expect the measured spec (`.impeccable/build/spec.json`, written by `comp-spec.mjs` from the approved comp), the approved comp path, and the skill scripts path. Optionally: a subset of region ids to produce, extra prompt notes per region, and format or transparency needs. Everything else you need is in the spec: each raster region's id, kind (plate, image, texture), pixel box, sampled palette, aspect, note, and the plate path it must land on.
|
||||
|
||||
- Approved mock path or screenshot reference.
|
||||
- Crop paths or a contact sheet with crop ids.
|
||||
- Output directory.
|
||||
- Required dimensions, format, transparency needs, and avoid list.
|
||||
- Notes on what should remain semantic HTML/CSS/SVG instead of raster.
|
||||
If there is no spec, stop and return one line asking the parent to run `comp-spec.mjs` first. You do not inventory the comp yourself; the spec is the inventory, and a second inventory disagrees with the first.
|
||||
|
||||
If the source mock is attached but has no filesystem path, use it for visual planning; ask for a path only before cropping or writing assets.
|
||||
## The job
|
||||
|
||||
Defaults unless contradicted:
|
||||
Every region with `medium: raster` in the spec ships as a plate at its `plate` path. A plate is the region regenerated at asset resolution from the comp crop as reference: same subject, same composition, same palette, same lighting and material, with the UI text and page chrome removed, at 1.5x the comp region's pixel size or more. The page draws text, controls, radius, shadow, and layout in code; the plate carries what code cannot draw. Crops from the comp are references, never shipping pixels: a comp is reference grade and a shipped crop is how a beautiful comp becomes a blurry site.
|
||||
|
||||
- `.webp` for opaque photos, backgrounds, and textures.
|
||||
- `.png` for transparent cutouts, seals, tickets, and illustrations.
|
||||
- Target production size, or at least 2x display size when dimensions are known. Never default to the small size of a full-page mock crop.
|
||||
- Remove UI text, navigation, buttons, labels, and body copy.
|
||||
- Keep physical marks only when the parent says they are part of the asset.
|
||||
- Remove letterboxing, empty padding, baked card corners, borders, shadows, caption bands, and layout background unless the parent says those pixels are intrinsic.
|
||||
- Keep the final assets directory clean: only files the build will consume. Source crops, reference crops, masks, and contact sheets go in a sibling `_sources`, `sources`, or review folder.
|
||||
Per region, in the spec's order:
|
||||
|
||||
Ask blockers once, globally. Missing source path/crops or output directory blocks production. Exact dimensions, compression targets, retina variants, and format preferences do not; choose defaults and report them.
|
||||
1. `node .github/skills/impeccable/scripts/comp-spec.mjs --crop <id>` writes the reference crop under `.impeccable/build/crops/`.
|
||||
2. Produce the plate. With the API fallback: `node .github/skills/impeccable/scripts/generate-image.mjs --plate <id> --quality high` does the whole step (crop as reference, the spec's plate prompt, output size chosen from the region's aspect, the file written to its plate path, prompt embedded, and the plate scored against the crop). With a harness-native image tool: use the crop as the input image and `node .github/skills/impeccable/scripts/comp-spec.mjs --plate-prompt <id>` as the prompt, write the result to the plate path, then run `node .github/skills/impeccable/scripts/embed-prompt.mjs <plate> --prompt "<the exact prompt>"`.
|
||||
3. Read the score line. `PLATE-SCORE` under 50%, or a `PLATE-WARN`, means the plate does not read as the region: open the plate beside the crop, name what drifted (subject, framing, palette, style), tighten the prompt with that, and regenerate once. Two misses on one region: keep the better plate, mark it `needs_parent_review`, and say why in one line.
|
||||
4. Transparent cutouts (a figure or object on the page ground): generate on a flat chroma color absent from the subject and key it to alpha before writing the PNG; never ship the keyed background.
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Inventory the full approved mock or every assigned crop.
|
||||
2. Put each visual role in exactly one bucket:
|
||||
- `produce`: needs generation, image editing, cleanup, cutout work, or a clean plate before it can ship.
|
||||
- `direct`: ships after format conversion, compression, or renaming because the parent supplied a real standalone source: a project file, stock, or prior production art. A crop from the approved mock is never `direct`, whatever its apparent size.
|
||||
- `semantic`: build in HTML/CSS/SVG/canvas, no raster output.
|
||||
3. Crops from the mock are binding visual references, never shipping pixels: a full-page mock's effective resolution is reference grade, and a shipped crop, however close it looks, is how a beautiful comp becomes a blurry site. Every mock-derived asset goes through `produce` as a clean regeneration.
|
||||
4. Give the parent an execution order for the `produce` bucket.
|
||||
5. For produced assets, choose the least inventive strategy: image-to-image clean plate, faithful regeneration from crop reference, transparent cutout, texture/pattern reconstruction, stock/project source, or a semantic HTML/CSS/SVG recommendation when raster is wrong.
|
||||
6. Use the harness's native image tool by default when generation or editing is needed; otherwise use the skill's generate-image.mjs.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Remove baked-in UI text, navigation, buttons, body copy, and mock chrome unless the text is part of the asset.
|
||||
8. Think through the final DOM/CSS representation before generating. If CSS will own radius, clipping, shadows, borders, perspective, responsive cropping, captions, or card frames, do not bake those into the bitmap.
|
||||
9. Save outputs non-destructively in the requested project directory, and leave the intent with the file: after every generation, run `node .github/skills/impeccable/scripts/embed-prompt.mjs <asset> --prompt "<the prompt used>"` so the prompt lives inside the image itself. The build thread composes what you made and needs to know what it is looking at, and the embedding survives copies where sidecars get lost.
|
||||
10. Compare each output against its source crop, opening every image by its workspace-relative path; sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths. If a review/QA tool is available, run it before the final manifest, then retry each major/fatal finding once before finalizing.
|
||||
|
||||
Use `texture/pattern extraction` only when the source region is already clean enough to sample as texture. If UI, cards, labels, headings, body copy, or footer chrome must be removed first, classify it as crop-derived cleanup or clean-plate work.
|
||||
|
||||
Use `semantic` for dashboards, charts, controls, screenshots of whole UI sections, data widgets, card chrome, app frames, icon toolbars, logos, wordmarks, and anything the final implementation can render crisply in HTML/CSS/SVG/canvas. Ship a screenshot raster only when the parent explicitly says the screenshot itself is the final asset.
|
||||
|
||||
Semantic does not mean ignored. For every semantic role, write a concrete implementation handoff for the parent craft agent: the DOM/component layers, CSS-owned visual treatment, SVG/canvas/icon-library pieces, responsive behavior, and which nearby produced raster assets it composes with. For logos and icons, prefer inline SVG/vector or icon-library implementation unless the parent provides a production logo raster.
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
Use this shape for image-to-image work:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Use the provided crop as the approved visual reference.
|
||||
Recreate the same asset as a clean reusable production image at the target component aspect ratio and at least 2x display resolution.
|
||||
Preserve silhouette, object/scene perspective, camera angle, palette, lighting, material, texture, and visual role.
|
||||
Remove baked-in UI copy, navigation, buttons, labels, body text, watermarks, and mock chrome unless explicitly part of the asset.
|
||||
Remove letterboxing, padding, card borders, rounded clipping, CSS shadows, perspective transforms, caption bands, and layout backgrounds that the implementation should create in code.
|
||||
Do not add new objects. Do not change the concept. Do not redesign the composition.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For transparent cutouts: use true alpha when the tool supports it; otherwise generate on a flat chroma-key color that cannot appear in the subject and post-process that color to alpha before shipping the PNG/WebP. Never ship the keyed background as the final asset.
|
||||
Do not redesign. Do not add objects, restyle, or reinterpret; the comp was approved as it is. Do not touch the page code, the spec, or the comp. Do not produce anything the spec does not list; a region the parent forgot goes back as a one-line note, not a plate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Contract
|
||||
|
||||
Return a complete manifest, grouped by `produce`, `direct`, and `semantic`. For each asset include: `id`, `source_crop`, `output_path` when applicable, `strategy`, `prompt_used` when applicable, `dimensions`, `format`, `transparency`, `deviations`, and `qa_status`.
|
||||
|
||||
For each semantic row include `id`, `implementation`, `notes`, and `qa_status`. The `implementation` is a concrete build handoff, not a note that no asset was produced: name the likely HTML/CSS/SVG/canvas/icon/component pieces and the visual responsibilities code owns.
|
||||
|
||||
`qa_status` is `accepted`, `needs_parent_review`, or `blocked`. `accepted` only after visual comparison passes. `needs_parent_review` for cut-off subjects, unwanted borders or rounded-card chrome, letterboxing, baked semantic text, low-resolution output, perspective that should have been CSS, missing transparency, or drift from the crop. `blocked` when inputs, permissions, image capability, or asset source quality prevent a credible result.
|
||||
|
||||
End with `execution_order`, `blockers`, and `assumptions` sections. Keep blockers global and minimal; per-asset rows carry only asset-specific risks or decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not modify implementation code. Do not edit the approved mock. Do not produce final page copy. The parent craft agent owns implementation and final mock fidelity.
|
||||
Return one line per raster region: `<id> <plate path> <WxH> <score>% <accepted|needs_parent_review|blocked> <one-line note or ->`. Then `blockers` (missing spec, missing comp, no image capability, exhausted key) and `assumptions`, each global and minimal. Nothing else: no summary, no praise, no implementation advice. The parent runs `build-phase.mjs advance` to verify the plates against the same spec; your line and its line must agree.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,16 +12,16 @@ A hard turn ceiling ends the run without warning; a run that ends before its con
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Contract
|
||||
|
||||
Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); the screenshots the parent captured, in `.impeccable/review/` (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: device-class names such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive). A screenshot path the calling brief names is authoritative when the file exists; `.impeccable/review/` is where to look when the brief names none or a named path is missing, never a filename you invent. Also expect: the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); the PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths; on a comp-led build the approved comp path (a code-led build has none; it passes the chosen decision comp as a separate critique-reference input, labeled as such, and nothing here that binds "the approved comp" binds it); and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. On a native (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) build the packet adds the platform reference path(s) (`reference/ios.md` / `reference/android.md`) and a line saying no detector ran: read the platform reference alongside the craft floor, judge every check in the platform's own conventions, treat the screenshots as device captures, and know your floor check is the build's only slop gate. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
|
||||
Expect: the original request; the confirmed user answers; the artifact path(s); the screenshots the parent captured, in `.impeccable/review/` (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: device-class names such as `phone.png` and `tablet.png`, suffixed per OS on adaptive). A screenshot path the calling brief names is authoritative when the file exists; `.impeccable/review/` is where to look when the brief names none or a named path is missing, never a filename you invent. Also expect: the direction contract (THESIS, OWN-WORLD, STORY, FIRST VIEWPORT, FORM); the PRODUCT.md path; existing hook or detector findings; the chosen world's QUALITY BAR card paths; on a comp-led build the approved comp path (a code-led build has none; it passes the chosen decision comp as a separate critique-reference input, labeled as such, and nothing here that binds "the approved comp" binds it); on a comp-led build the build state (`.impeccable/build/state.json`), the measured spec (`.impeccable/build/spec.json`), and the diff directories `.impeccable/review/diff/hero/` and `.impeccable/review/diff/final/` (each holds `side-by-side.png`, `heatmap.png`, `regions/<id>.png` paired crops, and `report.json` with per-region scores and verdicts from `comp-diff.mjs`); and the skill's `reference/craft-floor.md` path. On a native (`ios` / `android` / `adaptive`) build the packet adds the platform reference path(s) (`reference/ios.md` / `reference/android.md`) and a line saying no detector ran: read the platform reference alongside the craft floor, judge every check in the platform's own conventions, treat the screenshots as device captures, and know your floor check is the build's only slop gate. When the harness can view images, open the screenshots, the comp, and the card first, and inventory the comp's salient elements in your own words before reading the direction contract or any builder-authored summary: a review anchored on the contract inherits whatever the builder's abstraction dropped.
|
||||
|
||||
## Checks, in order
|
||||
|
||||
0. **Evidence.** Before any other check, verify the required captures exist and every capture is valid. Required: the platform's full viewport set (web: `desktop.png` and `mobile.png`; native: one capture per shipped device class), plus every capture the calling brief names as required, a reported user viewport (`user-<width>.png`) included. Valid: no black or blank regions, content matching what the filename claims (a visit capture showing the About section is invalid), the document top visible where the file claims a full page, dimensions that make sense for the named viewport. A required capture that is absent fails exactly like one that is malformed: a viewport nobody captured is a viewport nobody inspected, and it cannot ship. When any capture fails, the whole review changes shape: return `disposition: recapture` as the first line, then one section, `recapture`, listing each missing or invalid file and what a valid capture of it shows, and stop. Never build a matrix on malformed evidence; a verdict derived from a broken capture launders the breakage into an approval, and the parent owes you a full re-review on valid captures, not a scoring round.
|
||||
1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. On a comp-led build, `.impeccable/review/hero-repro.png` exists: the hero reproduction checkpoint's capture at the comp's own dimensions; its absence means the reproduction phase ran unproven, a material finding. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comp-round comps exist under `.impeccable/mocks/`, an approval record exists too: the surface brief naming the approved comp, or an `approved` flag in its sidecar. Comp-round comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, a material finding. Files under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` are exempt: they are the direction round's dealt hand, produced before any comp round, and imply no approval whatever the build path; a code-led build has no comp round at all.
|
||||
2. **Fidelity.** Against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, the primary action's treatment (a CTA the comp physically works, dissolves, or stamps is a signature element; its plain-rectangle rendition is contradicted), navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Three rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement; medium is part of the promise. GROUND: the page field's value and temperature against the comp's, sampled from pixels on both sides when tooling allows rather than judged from memory, and read as the net on-screen result where a texture or tile paints over the base color; a ground warmer or cooler than the comp's is contradicted however faithfully the layout matches, and drift toward the rendition prior (warm cream on light grounds, blue-black slate on dark) is the direction to hunt. With no approved comp, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality (CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never renders) as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. GROUND narrows rather than lapses: with no comp to sample, a color OWN-WORLD names is the target and the same warmer-or-cooler judgment applies; when OWN-WORLD names none, there is no GROUND authority, and the review says so in place of a verdict, because a target the reviewer invents turns the check into taste. A critique-reference comp on such a build is provocation, not spec: no element matrix, no adaptation citations, no asset obligations; its one contribution is what the image dared that the build did not, and dares worth adopting enter material_fixes as ordinary ordered fixes. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. A fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
|
||||
1. **Persistence.** PRODUCT.md exists. On a comp-led build, `.impeccable/build/state.json` exists and its `comps` (or `skipped` when a surface round locked the comp), `spec`, `plates`, and `hero` phases are `closed`; a comp-led config with no state file, or a state whose `comps` phase never closed, means the comp round was skipped and the build ran from a world description alone, a material finding that outranks craft; a phase closed with a `forced` record is disclosed as a material finding unless the user downgraded the comp in words the packet quotes; a state file whose `hero.gate.score` sits under 0.72, or a missing state file, means the reproduction ran unproven, a material finding, and `.impeccable/review/hero-repro.png` must exist either way. When DESIGN.md predates this build (an extension or redesign), it matches the built world; on a new world it is written after this review by the documenter, so its absence here is not a finding. When comp-round comps exist under `.impeccable/mocks/`, an approval record exists too: the surface brief naming the approved comp, or an `approved` flag in its sidecar. Comp-round comps with no recorded pick mean the approval point was skipped, a material finding. Files under `.impeccable/mocks/decision/` are exempt: they are the direction round's dealt hand, produced before any comp round, and imply no approval whatever the build path; a code-led build has no comp round at all.
|
||||
2. **Fidelity.** Start from the measurement, then judge what it cannot: read `.impeccable/review/diff/final/report.json` (and hero) first; every region scored `missing` or `contradicted` is a matrix row in that state unless the paired crop under `regions/` shows the score is wrong, and you say why; a region scored `match` still gets your eye for lettering character and material, which the numbers do not measure. Then, against your own element inventory of the approved comp, never against the contract's summary of it: topology, reading order, focal scale, overlaps and z-order, density, signature geometry, the primary action's treatment (a CTA the comp physically works, dissolves, or stamps is a signature element; its plain-rectangle rendition is contradicted), navigation items and icons, headline levels and scale relationships. Classify every salient element: match, acceptable adaptation, missing, contradicted, or added without approval. Three rows are mandatory in every matrix. TYPE: the display lettering's character, compression, width, weight, contrast, terminals, against the comp's; a face of a different character is contradicted however the layout matches. MATERIAL: an element rendered as flat CSS or clean vector where the comp shows painted, textured, dimensional, or photographic material is contradicted regardless of placement; medium is part of the promise. GROUND: the page field's value and temperature against the comp's, sampled from pixels on both sides when tooling allows rather than judged from memory, and read as the net on-screen result where a texture or tile paints over the base color; a ground warmer or cooler than the comp's is contradicted however faithfully the layout matches, and drift toward the rendition prior (warm cream on light grounds, blue-black slate on dark) is the direction to hunt. With no approved comp, TYPE and MATERIAL do not lapse: judge them against the contract's OWN-WORLD and the world's real materials, and treat faked physicality (CSS bevels, embossing, stamped-metal or chalk effects imitating a material the page never renders) as contradicted on its face; imitation material is the single most reliable mark of machine-made design. GROUND narrows rather than lapses: with no comp to sample, a color OWN-WORLD names is the target and the same warmer-or-cooler judgment applies; when OWN-WORLD names none, there is no GROUND authority, and the review says so in place of a verdict, because a target the reviewer invents turns the check into taste. A critique-reference comp on such a build is provocation, not spec: no element matrix, no adaptation citations, no asset obligations; its one contribution is what the image dared that the build did not, and dares worth adopting enter material_fixes as ordinary ordered fixes. An adaptation counts as intentional only when it cites the user answer, surface brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced it; an uncited deviation is a defect. A missing signature element, a changed topology, or content added without approval fails fidelity and outranks every craft point in material_fixes. When MATERIAL is contradicted on the focal element, or contradiction is the page rather than the exception, stop ordering repairs: make the first material fix a rebuild directive naming the comp regions to re-derive and the assets to produce; a list of patches against a rejected page launders the rejection into an approval. A fix that requires producing an asset says so explicitly ("produce: <region> as a raster asset"), never phrased as a style adjustment the parent will answer with CSS. The comp is the spec for composition, topology, element inventory, density, lettering character, and material; it is not a pixel spec for semantics, accessibility, or responsive reflow, and that allowance covers translation, never replacement.
|
||||
3. **Ceiling.** Against the QUALITY BAR card: name the world's native devices the build left unused, frame, depth, lettering treatment, ornament density, motion. The card governs commitment and finish, never composition.
|
||||
4. **Contract, promise by promise.** First verify FORM carries the seed key the concept roll printed; a contract with no seed key, or one the parent cannot corroborate, means the roll was skipped, a material fix ahead of any craft point. Then, for each of the five blocks: does the render keep the promise? Apply the memory test to the first viewport.
|
||||
5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every image-native region of the approved comp shipped as a real asset, not a gradient standing in for one, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind other paint is a compliance token, not a shipped material.
|
||||
5. **Truth.** Demonstration data authored and labeled synthetic; no invented commercial claims; unanswered claims present as marked placeholders, not omissions. Every raster region of the spec shipped as its plate (the spec names the file; the page references it; the region's diff row is not `missing`), not a gradient, an inline SVG, or a many-vertex `clip-path` standing in for it, and every produced asset visibly present in the screenshots; an asset applied at near-zero opacity or buried behind a wash is a compliance token, not a shipped material, and the detector's `buried-raster` and `organic-clip-path` findings in the packet are material fixes.
|
||||
6. **Floor.** Read the craft floor's Refuse list and hold the screenshots against it: kickers and eyebrows, hard offset shadows outside a neobrutalist world, glyph icons, system display faces, gradient text, side stripes, and the rest. A banned element is a material fix even when it matches nothing in the comp: the builder loaded the same ban before writing it, and fidelity to a comp cannot authorize what the floor refuses. The parent's hook findings cover this mechanically where hooks run; this check exists because hookless harnesses reach you with none, and the last two live sessions shipped five kickers past a reviewer that never looked.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not run a second detector pass; mechanical findings belong to the parent's hooks.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: impeccable
|
||||
description: Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
|
||||
version: 4.1.2
|
||||
version: 4.1.3
|
||||
user-invocable: true
|
||||
argument-hint: "[shape · audit|critique · animate|bolder|colorize|delight|layout|overdrive|quieter|typeset · adapt|clarify|distill · harden|onboard|optimize|polish · init|document|extract|live] [target]"
|
||||
license: Apache 2.0
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user