skills/pbakaus_impeccable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable.git synced 2026-09-21 18:47:02 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Sync generated provider output

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
github-actions[bot]
2026-08-04 18:30:42 +00:00
parent 3b35161000
commit e15d8e122f
30 changed files with 405 additions and 300 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.opencode/skills/impeccable/scripts/lib/roll-selection.mjs
+26 -19
View File
@@ -96,31 +96,38 @@ function* rank(items, input, idFor = item => item.id) {
.map(entry => entry.item);
}
// Two independent exclusions, and either one is enough to hold a world back.
// Rating grades quality: a 3-star earns a second ticket, a 1-star marginal keep
// leaves the pool. Breadth says whether a world can serve an arbitrary build at
// all, so a niche world leaves however good it is, keeping its approval for
// direct briefs. Breadth was split out of rating because the only way to hold a
// narrow world back used to be calling it marginal, which made "excellent but
// narrow" unrecordable and corrupted ratings as a calibration signal.
// Rating sets how many tickets a world holds; breadth decides whether it draws
// at all. A niche world leaves the pool however good it is, keeping its approval
// for direct briefs. Breadth was split out of rating because the only way to
// hold a narrow world back used to be calling it marginal, which made "excellent
// but narrow" unrecordable and corrupted ratings as a calibration signal.
//
// Two tickets for a 3-star, one for everything else, was too sharp. Measured
// against the catalog as it stood: 3-star worlds absorbed 57% of the graphic
// draw from 65 of 163 eligible worlds, 46% of atmosphere from 13 of 43, and
// 75% of interaction from 15 of 25. The reviewer's complaint, that the same
// worlds keep coming back, is what a rating multiplier does to a pool whose
// thinnest tier holds 25 worlds.
//
// So a 3-star no longer outdraws a 2-star, and a 1-star draws at half rather
// than not at all. A marginal keep is still worth showing sometimes: the
// judgement it records is "narrow or unexceptional", not "wrong", and excluding
// it entirely made a rating do a job breadth already does properly.
const RATING_TICKETS = { 1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 2 };
const ticketsForRating = rating => RATING_TICKETS[rating] ?? 2;
function challengerTickets(pool) {
return pool.flatMap(concept => {
const rating = concept.review?.rating;
if (rating === 1 || concept.review?.breadth === 'niche') return [];
return rating === 3
? [{ concept, ticket: 0 }, { concept, ticket: 1 }]
: [{ concept, ticket: 0 }];
if (concept.review?.breadth === 'niche') return [];
return Array.from({ length: ticketsForRating(concept.review?.rating) },
(_, ticket) => ({ concept, ticket }));
});
}
function compositionTickets(pool) {
return pool.flatMap(composition => {
const rating = composition.review?.rating;
if (rating === 1) return [];
return rating === 3
? [{ composition, ticket: 0 }, { composition, ticket: 1 }]
: [{ composition, ticket: 0 }];
});
return pool.flatMap(composition => Array.from(
{ length: ticketsForRating(composition.review?.rating) },
(_, ticket) => ({ composition, ticket })));
}
/**