skills/pbakaus_impeccable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable.git synced 2026-09-18 17:16:46 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Refactor: cleaner top-level directory structure (#138)

Browse Source 
* refactor(content): merge content/site/ into site/content/

Phase 1 step 1 of the directory restructure. The dual content tree was
called out in CLAUDE.md as cleanup; both trees were already in sync
except for anti-patterns-catalog.js, which moves to site/data/.

- Delete content/site/skills/ and content/site/tutorials/ (duplicates of
  site/content/, which is what Astro's content collection actually reads).
- Move content/site/anti-patterns-catalog.js -> site/data/.
- Update scripts/lib/sub-pages-data.js and scripts/build.js to read from
  site/content/ and site/data/.
- Drop content/site/ from validateProse target list (site/content was
  already there).
- Rewrite the "Two content trees" section in CLAUDE.md as a single-tree
  pointer; update stale dev-server text mentioning the deleted
  server/index.js.

Tests: 186/186 pass. Skills build: clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor(skill): rename source/skills/impeccable/ -> skill/

Phase 1 step 2 of the directory restructure. The path was redundantly
nested ("source/" wrapper plus "skills/impeccable/" — singular content
hidden behind the plural). Collapses to flat skill/SKILL.md +
skill/reference/ + skill/scripts/.

- Move source/skills/impeccable/ -> skill/.
- Rewrite scripts/lib/utils.js readSourceFiles(): drop the multi-skill
  iteration (CLAUDE.md commits to a single user-invocable skill); read
  skill/SKILL.md directly.
- Update scripts/build.js, scripts/generate-og-image.js, and the
  sub-pages data layer to point at skill/.
- Update tests/lib/utils.test.js: drop the "multi-skill" and "dir-name
  fallback" cases, update single-skill paths to skill/.
- Update tests/build.test.js similarly: drop "multiple skills"
  integration test, update paths.
- Update non-glob path joins in tests/framework-fixtures.test.mjs,
  tests/live-e2e/session.mjs, tests/live-e2e/agents/llm-agent.mjs,
  tools/live-loop.mjs.
- Update prose/text references in CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, DEVELOP.md,
  README.md, scripts/lib/sub-pages-data.js, bin/commands/skills.mjs,
  site/data/anti-patterns-catalog.js, site/pages/docs/[...slug].astro,
  docs/adr-live-variant-mode.md, docs/plans/.

Eval framework note: the separate impeccable-evals repo reads
../impeccable/source/skills/impeccable/ and needs a coordinated
rename to ../impeccable/skill/.

Tests: 186/186 pass. Skills build: clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor: rename docs/ -> notes/

Phase 1 step 3 of the directory restructure. The internal docs/ dir
(ADRs and plans) clashed with the site's /docs route. Renaming it
"notes/" makes the difference unambiguous: notes/ is project-internal
process, /docs is the user-facing route under site/pages/docs/.

No code references the dir; the rename is a clean git mv.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor(site): move public/ under site/public/

Phase 2 step 4 of the directory restructure. Public assets and the
Astro publicDir now live alongside the rest of the site, so site/
is fully self-contained for static content.

- git mv public site/public.
- astro.config.mjs: add publicDir: './site/public'. Astro defaults to
  ./public at the project root, so the override is required.
- scripts/build.js: write generated _data, _headers, _redirects,
  _routes.json, and js/detect-antipatterns-browser.js into
  site/public/. Also delete the dead _REMOVED() Bun static-site
  builder (replaced by Astro at #130; the placeholder no longer earns
  its keep).
- scripts/build.js validateProse: replace the stale public/index.html
  reference (deleted at the Astro migration) with site/pages/index.astro
  in the count-validation file list, restoring homepage drift detection.
- scripts/generate-og-image.js: write OG image into site/public/.
- scripts/screenshot-antipatterns.js: read examples from + write
  screenshots to site/public/antipattern-{examples,images}/.
- scripts/lib/sub-pages-data.js: load command demos from
  site/public/js/demos/commands.
- .gitignore: rename the public/* generator-output entries to
  site/public/*.
- CLAUDE.md: refresh CSS/data-file paths (still pointing at the old
  pre-Astro public/css/ + public/js/ tree), point the changelog and
  command-add checklists at site/pages/index.astro and
  site/scripts/data.js + site/scripts/components/framework-viz.js.

Cloudflare Pages note: functions/ stays at the repo root because
CF Pages auto-discovers it there with no configuration knob to
relocate. Moving it under site/ would either break deployment or
require a build-time copy step that adds more complexity than the
cleanup is worth.

Tests: 186/186 pass. Skills + site build clean. _headers,
_redirects, _routes.json, _data/ all land in build/ correctly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* refactor(cli): consolidate bin/ + src/ + lib/ under cli/

Phase 2 step 5 of the directory restructure. The CLI surface was split
across three top-level dirs whose names were easy to mistake for each
other (especially src/ vs source/ pre-step-2). Consolidates under cli/.

- git mv bin -> cli/bin (CLI entry + skills sub-command)
- git mv src -> cli/engine (detect-antipatterns engine + browser variant)
- git mv lib -> cli/lib (download-providers helper)

Update package.json:
- bin.impeccable: cli/bin/cli.js
- main + exports: cli/engine/detect-antipatterns.mjs and the
  ./browser variant
- files: ["cli/", "LICENSE"]

Update internal references:
- cli/bin/cli.js: dynamic import points at ../engine/, package.json
  read goes one level deeper (../../package.json).
- functions/api/download/[type]/[provider]/[id].js + bundle/[provider].js:
  cli/lib/download-providers.js path.
- scripts/build.js, scripts/build-browser-detector.js,
  scripts/build-extension.js: cli/engine path constants.
- scripts/lib/sub-pages-data.js, scripts/lib/utils.js, skill/scripts/
  live-server.mjs: comment refs.
- tests/detect-antipatterns{,-browser,-fixtures}.test.{js,mjs},
  tests/windows-path-fix.test.js: import + read paths.
- AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md: doc paths.

Verified:
- npx node cli/bin/cli.js --version, --help, detect --help all work.
- bun run build, bun run build:browser, bun run build:extension all
  clean. Browser detector lands at cli/engine/detect-antipatterns-browser.js;
  extension/detector/detect.js still emits to the same location.
- bun run test: 186/186 pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: update browser-detector paths missed in cli/ rename

Bugbot caught two runtime path leaks where the comment got renamed
to cli/engine/ but the actual code still used the old src/ segment.

- skill/scripts/live-server.mjs: detectPaths array now joins cli, engine,
  detect-antipatterns-browser.js for both the repo-relative lookup
  (4 dirs up from .claude/skills/impeccable/scripts/ to repo root) and
  the npm node_modules fallback. Without this fix, the detection
  overlay would silently not load during live-server sessions.

- scripts/build.js: the post-build copy of the browser detector into
  site/public/js/ was reading from src/. The if (fs.existsSync(...))
  guard meant the copy was silently skipping, so antipattern-examples
  pages would 404 on /js/detect-antipatterns-browser.js once the site
  was deployed.

Tests: 186/186 pass. Build clean. site/public/js/detect-antipatterns-browser.js
re-emits as expected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: cleanup-deprecated import path missed an extra .. in cli/ rename

Bugbot caught three call sites in cli/bin/commands/skills.mjs that
import '../../skill/scripts/cleanup-deprecated.mjs'. Pre-rename, that
was correct from bin/commands/ (one parent to bin/, one to repo root).
After moving the file from bin/commands/ to cli/bin/commands/, the
path is one directory deeper, so it needs three .. segments to reach
the repo root. Without the fix, every cleanup invocation throws on
import and gets swallowed by the surrounding try/catch — silent skip.

cli/bin/cli.js's package.json read already uses '../../package.json'
(the same depth pattern), confirming three levels is correct.

Verified: dynamic import resolves and exports the expected functions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: sweep stale path/file references missed in the restructure

Same root cause as the two bugbot finds: some references in moved or
related files weren't tracked because they didn't match a simple
sed pattern. Caught the rest by walking each moved dir's depth and
each Astro-migration deletion.

Stale path references (post-Astro migration, missed earlier):
- CLAUDE.md: legacy URL redirects "live in server/index.js" -> point
  at the actual sources (scripts/build.js generateCFConfig +
  site/public/_redirects).
- AGENTS.md: counts.js path (public/ -> site/public/), changelog file
  (public/index.html -> site/pages/index.astro), screenshots note
  (public/ -> site/), source-of-truth dirs (source/, src/ -> skill/,
  cli/).
- tests/detect-antipatterns-browser.test.mjs: comment about routes
  "in server/index.js".
- skill/reference/live.md: workflow.css example for "this repo" was
  pre-Astro (public/css/) -> site/styles/. (User-project Vite/Next
  example unchanged.)

Stale path that pointed at moved files:
- tests/skills-cli.test.js: CLI path was '..', 'bin', 'cli.js'; now
  '..', 'cli', 'bin', 'cli.js'. Test isn't wired into bun run test
  but it would have failed if invoked.

Dead files (orphaned by Astro migration, never cleaned up):
- tests/server/download-validation.test.js: imported from
  ../../server/lib/{validation,api-handlers}.js which were deleted in
  b8f09c8. Test was a silent failure waiting to happen.
- scripts/lib/render-markdown.js: 156-line module with zero consumers
  (the only caller, scripts/lib/render-page.js, was deleted in the
  Astro cleanup).
- scripts/build.js: dead commented-out generateSubPages import.

Tests: 186/186 pass. Build clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(build): remove invalid Corepack packageManager spec

Cloudflare Pages rejects the build with `Unsupported package manager
specification (bun@1.3.11)`. The packageManager field follows
Corepack's syntax which only validates npm/pnpm/yarn — `bun@X.Y.Z`
parses as a malformed Corepack directive even though Bun itself
treats it as a hint.

Pre-existing on main since d874af0 (CF Pages deploy on main also
failing); just surfaces here because the PR triggers a fresh deploy.

CF Pages auto-detects Bun anyway (the build log confirms:
"Detected the following tools from environment: bun@1.3.11,
pnpm@10.11.1, nodejs@22.16.0"). Removing the field unblocks the
deploy without changing local dev behavior.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Bakaus <paulbakaus@pauls-mbp-3.lan>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Bakaus
2026-05-04 16:38:03 -07:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by Paul Bakaus Claude Opus 4.7
parent 2aeac48b19
commit e587004ee4
256 changed files with 383 additions and 2650 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skill/reference/shape.md
+151
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
Shape the UX and UI for a feature before any code is written. This command produces a **design brief**: a structured artifact that guides implementation through discovery, not guesswork.
**Scope**: Design planning only. This command does NOT write code. It produces the thinking that makes code good.
**Output**: A design brief that can be handed off to {{command_prefix}}impeccable craft, or directly to {{command_prefix}}impeccable for freeform implementation. When visual direction probes are used, the images are supporting artifacts, not the primary output.
## Philosophy
Most AI-generated UIs fail not because of bad code, but because of skipped thinking. They jump to "here's a card grid" without asking "what is the user trying to accomplish?" This command inverts that: understand deeply first, so implementation is precise.
## Phase 1: Discovery Interview
**Do NOT write any code or make any design decisions during this phase.** Your only job is to understand the feature deeply enough to make excellent design decisions later.
This is a required interaction, not optional guidance. Ask these questions in conversation, adapting based on answers. Don't dump them all at once; have a natural dialogue. {{ask_instruction}}
### Interview cadence
Discovery must include at least one user-answer round unless PRODUCT.md, DESIGN.md, or an already-confirmed brief directly answers the needed design inputs. With a sparse prompt, do **not** synthesize a complete brief for confirmation on the first response.
- Use the harness's structured question tool when one exists. Otherwise, ask directly in chat and stop.
- Ask **2-3 questions per round**, then wait for answers.
- Treat PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md as anchors; they reduce repeated questions but do **not** replace shape for craft. Shape is task-specific.
- Round 1 should clarify purpose, audience/context, and success or emotional outcome.
- Round 2 should clarify content/data/states and scope/fidelity.
- Round 3 should clarify visual direction, constraints, and anti-goals when still unresolved.
### Purpose & Context
- What is this feature for? What problem does it solve?
- Who specifically will use it? (Not "users"; be specific: role, context, frequency)
- What does success look like? How will you know this feature is working?
- What's the user's state of mind when they reach this feature? (Rushed? Exploring? Anxious? Focused?)
### Content & Data
- What content or data does this feature display or collect?
- What are the realistic ranges? (Minimum, typical, maximum, e.g., 0 items, 5 items, 500 items)
- What are the edge cases? (Empty state, error state, first-time use, power user)
- Is any content dynamic? What changes and how often?
### Design Direction
Force a visual decision on three fronts. Skip anything PRODUCT.md or DESIGN.md already answers; ask only what's missing.
- **Color strategy for this surface.** Pick one: Restrained / Committed / Full palette / Drenched. Can override the project default if the surface earns it (e.g. a drenched hero inside an otherwise Restrained product).
- **Theme via scene sentence.** Write one sentence of physical context for this surface: who uses it, where, under what ambient light, in what mood. The sentence forces dark vs light. If it doesn't, add detail until it does.
- **Two or three named anchor references.** Specific products, brands, objects. Not adjectives like "modern" or "clean."
### Scope
Always ask. Sketch quality and shipped quality are different outputs; don't guess between them.
- **Fidelity.** Sketch / mid-fi / high-fi / production-ready?
- **Breadth.** One screen / a flow / a whole surface?
- **Interactivity.** Static visual / interactive prototype / shipped-quality component?
- **Time intent.** Quick exploration, or polish until it ships?
Scope answers are task-scoped. Don't write them to PRODUCT.md or DESIGN.md; carry them through the design brief only.
### Constraints
- Are there technical constraints? (Framework, performance budget, browser support)
- Are there content constraints? (Localization, dynamic text length, user-generated content)
- Mobile/responsive requirements?
- Accessibility requirements beyond WCAG AA?
### Anti-Goals
- What should this NOT be? What would be a wrong direction?
- What's the biggest risk of getting this wrong?
## Phase 1.5: Visual Direction Probe (Capability-Gated)
After the discovery interview, generate a small set of visual direction probes **before** writing the final brief when all of these are true:
- The work is **net-new** or directionally ambiguous enough that visual exploration will clarify the brief.
- The requested fidelity is **mid-fi, high-fi, or production-ready**. Skip for sketch-only planning.
- The current harness has **built-in image generation capability** (for example, Codex with a native image tool). Do **not** ask the user to set up external APIs, shell scripts, or one-off tooling just to do this.
When those conditions are met, this step is mandatory for Codex and any harness with built-in image generation. Use native image generation; in Codex, use the built-in `image_gen` tool via the imagegen skill. If image generation is unavailable, do not ask the user to install APIs or tooling. State in one line that the image step is skipped because the harness lacks native image generation, then proceed.
Use probes to explore visual lanes, not to replace the brief.
Do not skip probes because the final UI will be semantic, editable, code-native, responsive, or accessible. Those are implementation requirements, not reasons to avoid visual exploration.
### What to generate
Generate **2 to 4** distinct direction probes based on the discovery answers, especially:
- Color strategy
- Theme scene sentence
- Named anchor references
- Scope and fidelity
The probes should differ in primary visual direction (hierarchy, topology, density, typographic voice, or color strategy), not just palette tweaks.
### How to use the probes
- Treat them as **direction tests**, not final designs.
- Use them to pressure-test whether the brief is pointing at the right lane.
- Ask the user which direction feels closest, what feels off, and what should carry forward.
- If the probes reveal a mismatch, revise the brief inputs before finalizing the brief.
### Important limits
- Do **not** skip discovery because image generation is available.
- Do **not** treat generated imagery as final UX specification, final copy, or final accessibility behavior.
- Do **not** use this step for minor refinements of existing work. It's for shaping a new surface or clarifying a big directional choice.
If image generation is unavailable, or the task doesn't benefit from it, skip this phase only with a one-line reason and proceed directly to the design brief.
## Phase 2: Design Brief
After the interview and any required probes, synthesize everything into a structured design brief. Present it to the user for explicit confirmation before considering this command complete. Stop after asking for confirmation; do not proceed to craft or implementation in the same response unless the user has already approved the brief.
### Brief Structure
**1. Feature Summary** (2-3 sentences)
What this is, who it's for, what it needs to accomplish.
**2. Primary User Action**
The single most important thing a user should do or understand here.
**3. Design Direction**
Color strategy (Restrained / Committed / Full palette / Drenched) + the theme scene sentence + 2–3 named anchor references. Reference PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md where they already answer, and note any per-surface overrides.
If you ran the Visual Direction Probe step, name which probe direction won and what changed in the brief because of it.
**4. Scope**
Fidelity, breadth, interactivity, and time intent from the Scope section of the interview. Task-scoped; these don't persist beyond the brief.
**5. Layout Strategy**
High-level spatial approach: what gets emphasis, what's secondary, how information flows. Describe the visual hierarchy and rhythm, not specific CSS.
**6. Key States**
List every state the feature needs: default, empty, loading, error, success, edge cases. For each, note what the user needs to see and feel.
**7. Interaction Model**
How users interact with this feature. What happens on click, hover, scroll? What feedback do they get? What's the flow from entry to completion?
**8. Content Requirements**
What copy, labels, empty state messages, error messages, and microcopy are needed. Note any dynamic content and its realistic ranges.
**9. Recommended References**
Based on the brief, list which impeccable reference files would be most valuable during implementation (e.g., spatial-design.md for complex layouts, motion-design.md for animated features, interaction-design.md for form-heavy features).
**10. Open Questions**
Anything unresolved that the implementer should resolve during build.
---
{{ask_instruction}} Ask for explicit confirmation of the brief before finishing. If the user disagrees with any part, revisit the relevant discovery questions. A shape run is incomplete until the brief is confirmed.
Once confirmed, the brief is complete. The user can now hand it to {{command_prefix}}impeccable, or use it to guide any other implementation approach. (If the user wants the full discovery-then-build flow in one step, they should use {{command_prefix}}impeccable craft instead, which runs this command internally.)