Opus probe (r10-opus-wireframe): control articulates loose skeletons,
wireframe arm names them (dubbing script sheet, timecode gutter spine)
and diffs against the standard stack every time. Targets Paul's
layout-diversity question: concept-atom commitment with template
skeletons underneath.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul: 'way better to have the first iteration land fully committed to
the concept, because that's the genuinely hard part. the next pass can
make sure it is clear and effective.' The check selected against the
original lektor site itself, the campaign's 10/10 reference.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The inverse-probe extracted this from Paul's NewRelic review and it won
in the batch4 forward test; it was never ported. Craft diagnosis: pages
lose on rhythm monotony (one treatment uniformly applied), not defects.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul: no stochastic challenger-assignment mode (unreproducible bad draws
= undebuggable bug reports); keep the weigh-off. Every roll now prints
its key so any field report can be replayed with --from.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contract-probe campaign findings (evals repo, notes/fable-oneshot-craft-plan.md):
a single model's resonance ranking is deterministic (30/35 identical
concepts across 16 framings); dice must come from the script, mirroring
the palette-seed result. Derived candidates stay grounded in the
audience's world + subject's cultural home; challengers win only on
identification x clarity; incumbent-with-deliberate-idea overrides the
roll. Validated at contract level on 01-observability + r10-lektor
(teletext ranks #3 for lektor; assigned index 3 produced it).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four lines from the r10 dual consultation (codex gpt-5.6-sol + gemini
3.5-pro on the actual HTMLs) and the hero-probe micro-eval: the probe
isolated a first-viewport monoculture (same split template in every
sample, control and skill alike) and showed these lines break it while
codex's raw 15-liner alone does not. The incumbent sentence swap fixes
the r10 root cause both consultants independently identified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Transcript evidence (a12 01-observability): plans commit and deliver on
the axes with contract-strength language (palette, type, even theme
inversion) and stay default on the axis without one (layout gets a
single conventional breath). And plans living in invisible reasoning
means nothing can hold a build to its intent. The direction is now
written as a comment block at the top of the artifact answering: the
concept, the hour-later memory, why not the modal competitor page, the
signature, the first viewport's move. Critics and evals can score
delivery-against-contract; a mood is not an answer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul's a10 review: palettes are refreshed (the palette-exclusivity
line's fingerprint) while layouts stay boring in every version. Same
cure, same shape: the layout has exactly two legitimate sources, the
concept or the content's own structure; the category's habitual
skeleton is neither.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul's a11 review: heroes are safe SaaS viewports, everything
predictable; mobile Operate ships dark despite a brief that specifies
outdoors-in-motion use. Decide-then-build now opens with three
one-line directions differing in concept (the instinctive pick that
any studio would reach for is the default wearing your name); the
Operate mode adds: the usage scene is part of the spec, the theme
follows the scene, not the category's habit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per Paul: rather than gating a second file, fold what made the craft
path superior into the file both models already read 21/21 through the
gate. new-work.md gains 'Decide, then build' (direction as one
confirmable paragraph; attended pauses, unattended records-and-goes;
codex.md mock flow when image generation exists) and 'Finish like a
studio' (inspect, honest critique, patch, detector). craft becomes a
deprecated alias like teach: invoking it forces attended checkpoints,
nothing else differs; the reference is a redirect stub. codex.md
retargeted. Existing-world feature builds remain governed by the core
floor (unmeasured path, noted in the plan doc).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
a7 transcript evidence: 01-observability samples drew orange-honey and
green seeds, recited the color-strategy menu, and shipped dark
category-reflex palettes anyway; the model applied the subject's
workmanlike grammar to its own landing page. Two generic lines: the
mode belongs to the surface, not the subject (a landing page for a
dense tool is still Persuade; deciding a page can be plain because its
subject is workmanlike is the category error in reverse), and the
palette has exactly two legitimate sources (seed or the subject's
world; the category's habitual palette is neither).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul: the mode-governs section was de-biasing a persuade-tinted
playbook rather than writing neutral prose, the exact compensating-
paragraph anti-pattern. Rewritten: the corrective section is gone; the
first-viewport thesis speaks of the concept doing its job (the work,
the product, the content, the task); everything-bold's form list
includes the exact-system form natively; prove-don't-claim covers
content delivering; type guidance is parameterized by mode in one
sentence. Net shorter.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul's gallery check of the a8 docs run: skill-on still SaaS-ified the
documentation page. The playbook was persuade-flavored end to end, so
gating a greenfield Read surface through it risked amplifying exactly
that. New leading section: on Operate and Read surfaces boldness means
a committed system (typographic voice, spacing rhythm, one owned
accent, inevitable structure), the thesis is the content or the task
itself, and nothing invented may stand between the visitor and what
they came to do.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Answering the obvious question the family-depth framing dodged: with
modes derived per task, files named for the old two-register taxonomy
had no architectural reason to exist. brand.md's surviving depth (lane
test + inverse test, reflex-reject lanes, color discipline, layout
moves, permissions) folds into new-work.md, where all of it belonged:
it is new-identity Persuade/Experience guidance. product.md's content
moves unchanged to operate.md, its true name. Both old files remain as
one-line redirect stubs because register: brand|product in existing
PRODUCT.md files and older links point there. All cross-references
retargeted (SKILL.md modes intro, context.mjs REGISTER hint, live.md,
typeset.md); 85 tests green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Architecture per Paul: impeccable is primarily a daily driver on
existing codebases; the always-loaded core should serve that 90% path,
not carry the full generative arsenal on every invocation. SKILL.md now
holds brief-wins, existing-worlds (the headline path), the four visitor
modes, the full craft floor, and a hard gate: new identity work
(greenfield, or a redesign discarding the current look) MUST read
reference/new-work.md before any design decision. That file carries the
generative playbook (seed, subject grounding, plan/self-check/signature,
hero-thesis, everything-bold, prove-don't-claim, color commitment,
calibration, persuade type/imagery). context.mjs enforces the gate
mechanically: NEW_WORK directive when no PRODUCT.md/DESIGN.md exists,
and the old mandatory register-file read is replaced by a REGISTER
family hint. No surfaces: map anywhere; mode is derived per task.
Gate compliance is measurable via skillEvidence.directSkillFileReads.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
