From a forensics pass over twelve runs and two adversarial passes over
the metrics:
- comp-diff: detail is signed and penalizes invented energy; regions with
structure under 0.3 (or painted regions under 0.45 / added detail over
0.4) are contradicted whatever the mean says; palette ramp tightened;
region crops inherit the whole-image best translation so a shifted page
is not eight contradicted regions.
- hero gate: fails on any contradicted plate/image/text region (chrome and
controls keep the one-third allowance), on a capture that is not the
comp's frame, on a palette that is not the comp's, and on an organic
clip-path drawn inside a raster region's box.
- plates gate: scored against the comp crop with overlapping text/chrome
painted out (comp-spec plateReference; generate-image uses it too), with
a structure floor and an added-detail veto; the real plate passes, noise,
mirrors, mosaics, and other regions do not.
- comp-spec refuses a regions file that leaves comp ink unnamed.
- The direction-choice ping is folded into build-phase.mjs start
--direction --kind; the roll writes .impeccable/build/pending.json and
context.mjs / detect.mjs report COMP_ROUND_OPEN until the hero gate
passes. A code-led config makes start print the contract step and stop.
AI-assisted (Claude).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Fix Windows libuv abort in concept-seed after a successful roll
process.exit() with a live fetch keep-alive socket trips libuv's
UV_HANDLE_CLOSING assertion on Windows (nodejs/node#56645), aborting
the CLI with 0xC0000409 after complete output on the successful-roll
path. Destroy the global undici dispatcher before the explicit exit
so no socket is left to race; the hard exit stays, keeping the
no-linger guarantee on blackholed networks.
Fixes#504
Prepared with AI assistance (Cursor agent) under maintainer direction.
* Add regression test for the successful-API dispatcher teardown
The suite covered local rolls and the unreachable-API fallback but
never a successful roll, the one path where a pooled keep-alive
socket exists at exit (issue #504). Serve a real /api/roll from a
local server and assert the CLI destroys fetch's global dispatcher
before its explicit exit. Verified to fail without the fix.
Prepared with AI assistance (Cursor agent) under maintainer direction.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
* Route the direction hand by verdict, add the pick card, enforce salience parity
The decision round previously rendered every dealt challenger as an equal
full card whatever the weighing said, so a world that fused poorly (an
underwater world dealt to a flower shop) sat at the same visual weight as
the assigned direction, and concept-level fusion had no surviving output.
Three changes, all presentation-layer; the dice, the assignment, and the
two-axis weighing are untouched:
- Verdict routing: the weighing closes with wins / competitive / declined
per challenger, decided before any borrowing. Declined challengers render
demoted (narrow, quiet, catalog art as a labeled thumb, "Adopt anyway"),
reordered to the end of the deck by the page itself, still adoptable,
never silently dropped. Donations return as named "raised by" lines on
the assigned card: a declined challenger donates ambition and system
discipline, never its clothes.
- The pick card: one card for the model's top-ranked grounded candidate
when the dice assigned another, kicker MY PICK, honest familiarity risk
on its face. One card, never a ranked list, never the lead position; the
anti-menu rule survives with exactly this carve-out.
- Salience parity: a card's imagery weight is capped by the assigned
card's. With a text-only assigned card (no image generation in the
harness), full-bleed catalog heroes demote to labeled thumbs, so what
looks important is the verdict's call, never rendering luck.
serve-question payload gains additive fields (verdict, kept, raised); old
payloads render unchanged. concept-seed's rendered instructions carry the
verdict/donation contract and the pick-card carve-out. Covered by two
Playwright tests in the new-work e2e suite (verdict routing + parity).
Design exploration and rationale were worked through with the maintainer;
research grounding is impeccable.style/research lessons 3-5.
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Add Safer/Bolder re-roll registers to the direction round
The re-roll gains the user's steering wheel on the familiar-to-bold axis.
The decision page renders two register buttons beside the plain re-roll
(payload: reroll: { registers: ["safer", "bolder"] }; booleans still work),
the answer carries the chosen register, and concept-seed gains --register.
The design constraint that shaped the implementation: a register changes
only what a round INSTRUCTS, never what it DEALT. The same key and reroll
count reproduce the same deal whatever the register, so the exclusion chain
never forks and the reproduction contract holds with no API change.
- bolder: the dealt foreign forms become the whole hand, every challenger a
full card; the first-dealt challenger leads (assignment by deal order, so
the dice still choose). The pick card sits out; the canon stays.
- safer: the round's dealt hand is spent unseen and stays excluded; the
model presents its remaining conventional grounded candidates (at most
three) plus the canon executed against named competitors. This is the one
sanctioned lineup of the model's own ranked list, existing only by
explicit user request. Works degraded (needs no catalog); bolder degrades
to a plain grounded round, disclosed.
Registers are user steering, never the model's to pre-select. Covered by a
concept-seed unit test (same-deal invariant, validation) and a Playwright
test (button, answer field, REGISTER directive).
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Add the execution-contract round: comp-led or code-led, chosen after the direction
The build previously went comp-led for everyone, silently: a generated comp
led and the build chased it, which produces the boldest compositions and
also the measured worst-of-both-worlds failure (ambitious design landed
poorly, no motion, fix rounds after). Models already defect from it by
quietly skipping comp generation, which is unsanctioned code-led with no
contract to catch it. This makes the fork explicit and both paths
defection-proof:
- Comp-led: the comp is law and non-optional once chosen; visualize.md and
the comp-is-king build phases run as today.
- Code-led: no comp of this page, skipped by contract rather than drift.
The QUALITY BAR boards still calibrate finish, and the ambition moves
into the written direction contract (FIRST VIEWPORT plus a named
signature interaction and motion grammar), audited by the finish
reviewer in behavior. Not a discount on commitment.
Placement: a second round on the same open table, right after the
direction lands. Sketches stay in the direction round (they pick the
world); comps are what code-led skips (they bind the composition). The
chosen world sets the default lead; the user flips freely; a standing
preference recorded in PRODUCT.md skips the round on later surfaces; with
no image generation there is no fork, code-led is the only path.
Mechanism: serve-question gains payload-level followup: true, which keeps
the detached server alive after a pick (exactly like re-roll), swaps the
page to the loading hand instead of goodbye, marks the answer with
followup: true so --wait keeps the table, and prints a FOLLOWUP OPEN
directive telling the agent to deliver the next round via --update.
Covered by a Playwright test driving the full two-round flow.
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: address PR review bot findings
- Degraded safer register no longer contradicts itself (greptile,
Copilot, cursor): the degraded template previously said "the assigned
index is suspended; the user picks" and then emitted ASSIGNED INDEX,
the mandatory build instruction, and the restated footer anyway. The
degraded safer path now suppresses the assignment machinery entirely,
matching the non-degraded safer round, and restates the user-picks
behavior for truncated readers instead.
- A declined card's declared sketch no longer renders a full media face
(Copilot): the renderer ignores sketch slots on declined cards
outright, so a stray sketch cannot buy back the salience the verdict
took away.
- Bolder rounds no longer carry the generic weighing instruction
(cursor): it measures against the assigned grounded direction, which
the bolder register suspends; a leader-relative variant weighs the
fused challengers against the first-dealt leader instead.
All three pinned by new assertions in tests/concept-seed.test.mjs and
tests/new-work-e2e.test.mjs.
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: followup never arms the loading hand in blocking serve mode
cursor[bot] caught a client/server disagreement: the page interpolated its
FOLLOWUP constant from the payload alone, so a followup: true payload served
in blocking mode (no --start) would leave the browser on a loading hand that
nothing resolves, since a blocking server exits on any pick and has no
update channel. The page constant is now armed only when the server is
detached, blocking rounds get the goodbye screen as before, and new-work.md
states that followup belongs only on a detached round; blocking and
structured-tool channels run the build-path round as its own second
question. Pinned in tests/serve-question.test.mjs.
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Add card-kind choice telemetry and the bolder routing disambiguation
The choice ping previously fired only when a dealt catalog challenger won,
so pick-share and canon-share had no denominator and the decision page's
new spectrum could not be measured. The ping now fires once per resolved
attended round on API-dealt rolls: --kind names which card class won
(assigned / pick / challenger / canon), --chosen carries the catalog id
only when a dealt challenger won, and --register rides along when the
round came from a steered hand. Grounded candidates' names never leave the
machine (the ping carries the kind alone), the legacy id-only shape stays
valid, and DO_NOT_TRACK / IMPECCABLE_NO_TELEMETRY still disable the ping
entirely. The seed's TELEMETRY block teaches the new invocation.
Also the naming-collision guard: "bolder" said while a direction round is
open routes to the Bolder hand register, never the bolder refinement
command; one line each in bolder.md and new-work.md.
The /api/chosen field additions land in a sister impeccable-site PR; the
API ignores unknown fields meanwhile, so this is safe to ship first.
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix: ping test survives a DO_NOT_TRACK shell
cursor[bot]: the pingChosen unit test cleared only IMPECCABLE_NO_TELEMETRY,
so a developer shell with DO_NOT_TRACK set failed the success-path
assertions. The test now clears both, restores prior values in finally,
and passes under DO_NOT_TRACK=1.
AI-assisted change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
A 3-star held two tickets and a 1-star held none. On a pool this size that is
not a nudge, it is the shape of the draw. Measured against the live catalog:
3-star worlds absorbed 57% of the graphic draw from 65 of 163 eligible worlds,
46% of atmosphere from 13 of 43, and 75% of interaction from 15 of 25. The
reviewer's report that the same worlds keep returning is exactly what a rating
multiplier does to a corpus whose thinnest tier holds 25 worlds.
Now a 3-star draws level with a 2-star, and a 1-star draws at half rather than
not at all. Excluding a marginal keep made rating do a job breadth already does
properly: breadth still removes a niche world from the pool entirely, which is
the honest way to say "too narrow to challenge an arbitrary build", while a
1-star records "unexceptional" and is still worth showing sometimes.
Effect on the same catalog: the 3-star share falls to 39% on graphic, 30% on
atmosphere and 60% on interaction. That last one is no longer a weighting
artefact, it is simply what the tier contains, since 15 of its 25 eligible
worlds are rated 3.
Compositions get the same treatment; the two ticket functions had the identical
shape and no reason to disagree. Both tests asserted the old policy directly
and now assert the new one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The composition pool (stagings) is not ready: too thin to help, and its
draws crowd the decision it rides along with. concept-seed.mjs stops
rendering the staging block by default; IMPECCABLE_COMPOSITIONS=1
re-enables it for catalog development, and the draw machinery,
rating-weighted selection, and mode scoping stay intact and tested for
its return. new-work.md drops the dress-the-staging-challengers
instruction and the FORM contract's staging clauses; the surface-scope
roll still assigns which of the model's own structures gets built.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The area taxonomy was wrong, and wrong in a way worth recording. It was
derived from Mobbin-style categories in the abstract rather than from what
the skill can be asked for, and measured against the catalog most of it
described problems that were not there: onboarding, settings, empty-state and
search each had zero entries.
Reframed against demand instead. A user asks for a docs site, an onboarding
flow, a landing page, or a data table, and those differ in how much of the
product is in play. Register already says what kind of work it is; grain says
how much: product, flow, view, region.
Named grain rather than scope because scope already means direction-or-surface
on every roll and 'surface' is already a register value, so a scope of
'surface' would have collided with both.
Platform is the second axis: web, ios, android. Unlike grain it is a hard
filter with no fallback, because a composition that leans on hover or a
pointer does not degrade on a phone into something slightly worse, it stops
working, and an empty deal is a visible gap where a broken one is not.
Both fields are optional and absence means eligible everywhere, so nothing
needs backfilling and no existing roll changes.
The third piece is the one a trace turned up. Asking for an onboarding flow
resolves to register=operate, grain=flow, and the catalog holds zero
flow-grain compositions, so the top-up would have dealt three plausible
single-screen compositions with no signal that none matched. The model would
have improvised the flow structure while believing it was handed one, which is
the same silent plausibility the axis exists to remove. Selection now returns
a match alongside the picks, and the rendered seed says when the structure is
borrowed and why.
Measured at the time of writing: 137 of 173 approved compositions are view
grain, product grain is empty, flow grain holds one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two gaps, both reported from real use. Worlds were drawn with no mode
awareness at all: selectApprovedChallengers never received the mode, so a
build asking for an app UI could draw six worlds that only make sense on a
landing page. And surface alone is too coarse for compositions, because
"operate" spans onboarding, dashboards, editors and settings, so an
onboarding flow could legitimately be dealt a settings composition.
Worlds gain `allowedModes` on the review record, beside breadth and rating,
because it is a reviewer judgment rather than authored content. Absent means
eligible in every mode, so nothing needs backfilling and no existing roll
changes. Applied per tier and skipped where it would empty one, matching how
minRating and strength already degrade. It is a ceiling the reviewer lowers,
not a category they assign: a world is an identity, and identities transfer
across modes further than compositions do.
Compositions gain an optional `area`, one level below surface, with a
taxonomy per surface (COMPOSITION_AREAS). Area is a preference rather than a
filter: a request reorders the ranking to put area matches first and tops up
from the rest of the surface, because the per-area pools are small and
dealing one on-target composition would be worse than three good ones. A
stable partition of an already deterministic ranking stays deterministic.
`--area` on the CLI requires `--mode`, since areas are scoped to a surface,
and is validated against that surface's list so a wrong-surface area fails
loudly instead of silently matching nothing.
Also validated `breadth`, which selection has honoured for a while with
nothing checking it, so a typo read as "general" and quietly returned a
narrow world to the pool.
Four new tests: worlds excluded from a mode stay out, absent allowedModes
stays eligible everywhere, a tier whose every world excludes the mode falls
back instead of starving, and an area-scoped deal prefers its area, tops up
to three, and reproduces from its key.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The data layer has said compositions since the catalog was split, while the
code, the model-facing text, and the UI still said stagings. The rename was
held back by the selection logic existing twice; it exists once now, so this
is one pass instead of two coordinated ones.
Renamed: selectApprovedStagings, selectApprovedStaging, renderStaging, and
the model-facing STAGING GRAMMAR / STAGING CHALLENGERS / FIRST-SURFACE
STAGING INPUTS headings. The block that introduces them now states what
they are for rather than only what they are not: what is the cleverest way
to present, organize, or make interactive the problem in front of you.
Three places keep the old word on purpose:
- The rank salt, `${scope}:${key}:staging`. It is hash input, so renaming
it would re-deal every roll anyone has ever reproduced by key. Verified:
240 seeder rolls and 252 API rolls reproduce exactly.
- `Staging/hierarchy:`, the first composition grammar prefix. Inside a
composition, staging names one of its four aspects, which is a different
word-sense from staging as the name for the whole artifact. It is also a
schema constant that 317 catalog entries are validated against.
- The wire fields. The API keeps emitting `stagings` and `staging` beside
`compositions`, because the wire is the one place a rename cannot be
coordinated with already-installed skills. Clients prefer the new field
and fall back through both old ones.
Separately, WELL_TIERS had two definitions after the extraction.
roll-selection.mjs owns it now and concept-catalog.mjs imports it, in that
direction because concept-catalog reads the filesystem and a Pages Function
must not pull node:fs into its bundle. Imported and re-exported rather than
re-exported alone: a bare `export { X } from` does not bind X locally, and
validateConceptCatalog needs it, which cost one round of red tests.
Dropped concept-catalog's synchronous deterministicRank. Nothing imports it
since selection moved out, and leaving a second ranking implementation
around is how the first drift started.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Stagings now honour approval ratings exactly as world challengers do, a
3-star earning a second ticket and a 1-star marginal keep leaving the
pool, which matters more here because per-surface staging pools are
small enough that an unweighted shuffle repeats a weak staging often.
Each ticket carries its index into the deterministic ranking so the
id-dedupe cannot silently collapse the doubled odds into a no-op, and
an all-marginal pool still deals rather than starving. The composition
catalog validates the new grades: 1-3, approved entries only. Tests
cover the weighting, the dedupe subtlety, and the fallback.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rating grades quality, breadth says whether a world can serve an
arbitrary build at all; while they shared one field, the only way to
hold a narrow world back was calling it marginal, which made excellent
but narrow unrecordable and corrupted the ratings as a calibration
signal for the next authoring round. Both axes now exclude
independently, either kind of hold keeps its approval for direct
briefs, an all-niche tier falls back rather than starving, and
stagings honour the same gate with the same fallback. Tests cover the
niche exclusion at strength, the fallback parity with marginal-only
tiers, and the staging gate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul reproduced the Opus smoke failure in a fresh repo: given a
natural-language build intent, the model runs concept-seed directly and
skips the init divert entirely, so PRODUCT.md never exists and nothing
grounds the challenger fusion. Prose already says init-first in both
SKILL.md routing and new-work.md; prose alone does not hold the floor.
The deal path now refuses with a NO_PRODUCT_MD directive routing to
reference/init.md when loadContext finds no PRODUCT.md. The --chosen
telemetry ping stays ungated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The ship40 concept pipeline had reversed the proven a-series mechanisms:
the seed's roll decayed into a shortlist nomination that taste functions
(model ranking, candidate floor, simulated user) then argmaxed into the
safest card; the costume check returned as the Translation veto and
carrier-removal test; and the 07-15 rewrite deleted the calibration,
reflex-font lanes, color strategies, and commit-every-atom language that
had held off the cream-editorial default since the alpha era. Five of six
frozen craft directions converged on the same warm-paper family and both
builders obeyed them.
This lands the repair on top of the in-progress simplification:
- new-work.md: the script assigns the build index again on both scopes;
catalog challengers are fused (challenger supplies form and grammar,
product supplies every fact, clarity wins conflicts) and weighed on the
two proven axes only; attended runs present one fully committed
direction with re-roll and an optional steer instead of a ranked
lineup; the color-strategy picker, reflex-face list, saturated-look
calibration, first-viewport thesis and memory test, commit-every-atom,
scroll pacing, and prove-don't-claim return; the direction contract
returns as five lean blocks audited by the separate-agent finish.
- concept-seed.mjs: PROMOTED INDEX becomes ASSIGNED INDEX with
build-assignment semantics; self re-roll only on named factual grounds.
- craft-floor.md: hook-active sessions act on findings instead of
re-auditing; the Refuse list is framed as category defaults the brief
can earn; a closing commitment line keeps a ban list from being the
last word before code.
- codex.md / shape.md: contract references restored for flow coherence.
Adopts the concurrent session's ceremony cuts, softened challenger
instruction, seed SOURCE IDs and --candidate-count, detector-ownership
fix, and the removal of the hook-side contract audit (the audit now
belongs to the separate reviewer at finish).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A single staging input was too weak a counterweight to the model's
habitual page skeleton: beside six identity challengers it read as one
optional flourish rather than a real search over composition. Roll three
from distinct staging families so a roll tests materially different
hierarchy, sequence, and interaction laws.
selectApprovedStagings replaces the single-pick selector; the old
selectApprovedStaging stays as a count-1 wrapper for smoke tests. Re-rolls
exclude every earlier set, and an absent mode still returns nothing rather
than falling back across modes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The public repo keeps the OSS promise surface: skill, CLI, extension,
tests, and the provider build. The site, labs, concept/composition
catalogs, image pipeline, Cloudflare functions, and authoring guide move
to pbakaus/impeccable-site.
concept-seed tests run against a synthetic fixture catalog; the plugin
icon and skill categories moved in-repo; build validation narrows to
README prose and non-site counts; release notes read from a sibling
impeccable-site checkout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
