The probe asked whether node could load ESM, while the notice promised a
Node 22 floor and package.json engines declares >=22.12.0. Reviewers kept
flagging the gap, and they were right to: a 14.18-to-21 runtime passed the
probe on the strength of one import while the hook and its detector bundle
are only ever exercised on the engines floor, so "can load our code" was a
weaker claim than the one being made for it.
Check the floor directly: parseInt(process.versions.node) >= 22, in
ES5-only syntax that parses on any node old enough to fail it. Probe and
notice now derive from one NODE_MAJOR_FLOOR constant, so they cannot
disagree, and the archaeology about node: scheme support and pre-15
unhandled-rejection semantics goes with the import it explained.
Add the missing contract test: every generated hook command carries the
probe, the notice appears exactly where a harness can render it (Claude
and Codex, project and plugin), and the expected floor is read from
package.json engines rather than repeated by hand.
Verified against a fake pre-22 node, no node, and a real node: one notice
then the marker holds it silent, exit 0 in every failure shape, and the
hook's own exit code still passes through on a supported runtime.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 (via Cursor) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Greptile flagged that the probe does not enforce the Node 22 engines floor.
Two parts to that, and they land differently.
The real defect is narrower and worse than stated: the hook closure imports
`node:fs`, `node:os`, `node:path` and `node:url`, and the `node:` scheme needs
14.18, so a bare `import('fs')` probe passed on 12 and 13 and those runtimes
then died on the real import, which is the banner this branch exists to remove.
Probing `node:fs` closes that. The added `.catch(()=>process.exit(1))` is load
bearing rather than tidiness: before Node 15 an unhandled rejection is only a
warning and the process still exits 0, so a rejected probe would have read as a
pass on exactly the versions in question.
Not enforcing 22 is deliberate and stays. The probe asks whether this runtime
can load our code, not whether it is a supported one, so a 14.18-to-21 runtime
that works today keeps working rather than being silently switched off. The
notice names 22 because that is the version worth installing, and it only ever
reaches someone whose runtime already failed the probe, so no user is shown a
threshold that contradicts what ran.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bugbot caught the Codex plugin builder still invoking node directly, and the
same reasoning covers GitHub Copilot and Grok Build: all three shipped the
exact failure this branch exists to stop, and sat visibly inconsistent with
their guarded siblings.
Route them through guardedNode with no notice, matching Codex and Cursor.
GitHub gains a second property from it: outside a git repository
`$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)` expands to nothing, so the old command
handed node a path that could not exist and failed the turn. The file test
now short-circuits that to exit 0.
Every builder carries the probe; only the two Claude manifests carry the
notice, which is the only harness whose response shape is confirmed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Add GitHub Copilot hook support (CLI + cloud agent)
Wire the Impeccable design detector into GitHub Copilot's hook system so
direct file edits get the same post-edit design feedback the Claude Code,
Codex, and Cursor harnesses already receive.
GitHub Copilot's contract differs from the existing harnesses (verified
against Copilot CLI 1.0.63):
- Repo-level manifest at `.github/hooks/impeccable.json` (read by both the
CLI, once committed to the default branch, and the cloud/app agent).
- Flat `postToolUse` entries with `bash`/`timeoutSec` and a full-match
`matcher` regex; the file-editing tools are `edit` and `create`.
- The stdin event uses camelCase `toolName`/`toolArgs`, where `toolArgs` is
a JSON *string* carrying the touched file under `path`.
- Context is injected via a top-level `additionalContext` string.
Changes:
- hooks.js: buildGitHubHooksManifest() + route `github` in hooksJsonFor().
- providers.js: emitHooks/hooksManifestRel for the github provider.
- hook-lib.mjs: detect the github harness, normalize the camelCase event
(parse the JSON-string toolArgs -> tool_input.file_path), and emit the
`additionalContext` payload shape.
- hook-admin.mjs / skills.mjs: install + idempotent-repair the
`.github/hooks/impeccable.json` manifest (bash-aware marker stripping).
- hooks.md: document GitHub Copilot as a supported harness.
- Tests for the builder, routing, event normalization, and end-to-end run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Cover Copilot apply_patch edits in the hook (live-verified)
The first cut matched only `edit|create`, the tool names `copilot -p` uses.
A live trace against Copilot CLI 1.0.63 in an interactive session showed it
edits files via `apply_patch`, whose toolArgs is a raw OpenAI-format patch
string (`*** Begin Patch` / `*** Add File:`), not JSON. With the narrow
matcher the hook command never ran.
- hooks.js / hook-admin.mjs: matcher -> `edit|create|apply_patch`.
- hook-lib.mjs: normalizeGitHubEvent now routes apply_patch's raw patch
string into tool_input.command (reusing the existing parseApplyPatchPaths /
resolveTargetFiles plumbing) and only JSON-parses toolArgs for the
edit/create/view tools. tool_name is normalized to apply_patch so the patch
path is extracted even if a future build relabels the tool.
- Tests: apply_patch matcher assertions, event normalization, and an
end-to-end runHook covering the interactive/cloud path.
Verified live: a trusted interactive `apply_patch` edit fires the hook and
returns the expected `additionalContext` design reminder.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* Address review feedback + add changelog entry
- hook-lib.mjs (Bugbot, low): looksLikeApplyPatch no longer misroutes an
edit/create event whose edited *content* contains apply_patch markers. A
real apply_patch payload is a raw string that does not parse as JSON; an
edit payload is a JSON object, so only non-JSON-object strings are treated
as apply_patch. Edit events keep extracting `path`. Adds a regression test.
- skills.mjs (Bugbot, medium): document why `.github` is intentionally
excluded from hookScriptPathForProvider. Its hook manifest is committed and
shared (read by the Copilot cloud agent and teammates), so the command must
stay portable via `$(git rev-parse ...)`; rewriting it to a machine-local
absolute path would break those. GitHub skills are project-scoped, so the
project-relative path resolves.
- changelog: add an Upcoming (v3.x placeholder) entry for the Copilot hook.
Version is not bumped yet (batching with other changes).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
