mirror of
https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable.git
synced 2026-09-12 06:06:37 +03:00
Paul BakausandClaude Fable 5
4432b92bbb
A codex greenfield build produced an excellent approved comp and then an abysmal page, and the reviewer approved it. The failure chain: the implementation inventory downgraded a photographic hero to 'silhouette in SVG' and sculpted panels to 'material finish: CSS'; the builder read 'no photography on hand' as a license to avoid photographic rendering; QA looked at one full-page thumbnail; the reviewer was spawned with the builder's forked history and then scored fix claims instead of pixels; and the output contract had no way to say 'rejected'. The fixes, stage by stage: - The inventory's medium column gets a gate: a human figure, product object, machinery, or lit material is raster whatever the stack, and such regions are regenerated cleanly at asset resolution with the comp and its embedded prompt as reference. Never cropped from the comp, whose effective resolution is reference grade; the asset producer's direct bucket closes the same hole. Dropping an image-native region is a user decision at the approval point. - Generated imagery is a material, not a claim: evidence rules bind assertions, never render fidelity. - The build thread's inspection becomes a region-by-region side-by-side against the comp at legible scale, never one full-page thumbnail. - The reviewer spawns fresh, never with forked history (fork_turns: 0 in codex), and gains a rejection lane: when TYPE, MATERIAL, and the focal element are all contradicted, the first material fix is a rebuild directive the parent surfaces to the user instead of patching. Verdict passes score recaptures only; the parent's fix narration is not evidence. - The verdict-loop ceiling softens: two rounds ends an unattended run, but an attended session puts the open-items table in front of the user and lets them fund another round; any round that resolves nothing stops the loop. - Comp approval joins the roll as skip-proof: question-tool errors fall back to the decision page, delegation is recorded in the brief and the sidecar and disclosed up front, and the reviewer treats comps with no recorded pick as a material finding. - Craft floor: system display faces (Impact, Arial Black) as an own-world display voice and unicode glyphs standing in for icon systems are named failures. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>