Files
pbakaus_impeccable/skill
Paul BakausandClaude Fable 5 c9213835e7 Review fidelity against the comp itself, not the builder's summary of it
A codex run turned an approved comp into a related second art direction
and the finish reviewer passed it: the review anchored on the direction
contract, a lossy abstraction the builder wrote, and every element that
abstraction dropped passed silently. Four changes close that chain. The
reviewer inventories the comp's salient elements before reading the
contract and classifies each one (match, adaptation, missing,
contradicted, added without approval), with adaptations citing the
answer, brief, accessibility need, or product truth that forced them,
and fidelity failures outranking craft in material_fixes. The visualize
inventory gate records compositional commitments alongside asset media,
since the 150-word contract cannot carry them. The north-star allowance
now says what it permits: translation, never recomposition. And the
finish sequence recaptures the same viewports once after the fix batch,
so what the documenter records is what actually shipped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-27 15:13:27 -07:00
..