Both review bots found real gaps in the first pass: candidates were
verified as local branch names only, so an origin/HEAD target with no
local checkout fell through, and stripOrigin() dropped upstreams on any
remote not named origin (fork workflows tracking upstream/release).
Candidates now carry a display name plus the revs to try in order: the
upstream's remote rev wins outright (it tracks the actual merge target,
so it beats a possibly stale local branch of the same name), origin/HEAD
tries the local branch then the remote-tracking ref, and the
conventional names each try local then origin/<name>. git.base keeps
reporting the friendly branch name while the diff runs against whichever
rev resolved. Two new failing-first tests: remote-only default branch,
and an upstream on a remote named upstream with no local base branch.
Prepared with AI assistance (Claude Code), directed by @pbakaus.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
Paul BakausandClaude Code
ea098ceb96