mirror of
https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills.git
synced 2026-09-11 19:47:12 +03:00
Squash-merge verified routing remediation at exact head 690f9c14b0. Required validate and paired evaluation checks passed; advisory droid review had no blocking findings.
248 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
248 lines
15 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: pydanticai
|
|
description: >-
|
|
Build type-safe AI agents and graph-based workflows with PydanticAI and PydanticGraph.
|
|
Agent creation, function tools, capabilities, dependency injection, structured output,
|
|
streaming, multi-agent patterns, testing, evals, and graph state machines. Use whenever
|
|
you are building agents, tool-using LLM workflows, or graph-based state machines in
|
|
Python. Do not use this skill for unrelated requests; route to the nearest named
|
|
specialist.
|
|
license: MIT
|
|
metadata:
|
|
source: https://pydantic.dev/docs/ai/overview/
|
|
version: "1.0.4"
|
|
compatibility: Python 3.10+; requires pydantic-ai or pydantic-ai-slim package
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# PydanticAI & PydanticGraph Expert Skill
|
|
|
|
PydanticAI is a Python agent framework for building production-grade GenAI applications, built by the team behind Pydantic. PydanticGraph is its companion graph/state-machine library.
|
|
|
|
**Install:**
|
|
```bash
|
|
pip install pydantic-ai # Full install (all providers)
|
|
pip install "pydantic-ai-slim[openai]" # Minimal install + your provider
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Quick Reference
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from pydantic_ai import Agent
|
|
|
|
# Basic agent — one line
|
|
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-5.2', instructions='Be concise.')
|
|
|
|
# Run it
|
|
result = agent.run_sync('What is the capital of France?')
|
|
print(result.output)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## When to Load Which Reference
|
|
|
|
| Topic | Load When | File |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| **Agent creation & lifecycle** | You need to create, configure, or run an agent — define tools, deps, output types, run methods, streaming | `references/core-agents.md` |
|
|
| **Capabilities & hooks** | You need built-in capabilities (Thinking, WebSearch, MCP, etc.), on-demand loading, lifecycle hooks, or custom capabilities | `references/capabilities-hooks.md` |
|
|
| **PydanticGraph** | You need a state machine, graph-based control flow, parallel execution, BaseNode subclasses, or GraphBuilder with joins/decisions | `references/graph.md` |
|
|
| **Models, output & streaming** | You need multi-model setups, FallbackModel, streaming output, output functions, or structured output with validation | `references/models-output.md` |
|
|
| **Multi-agent patterns & integrations** | You need agent delegation, programmatic hand-off, MCP servers, durable execution, or UI adapters | `references/patterns.md` |
|
|
| **Testing & evaluation** | You need TestModel, FunctionModel, pytest patterns, overrides, or Pydantic Evals for systematic eval | `references/testing-evals.md` |
|
|
| **Full worked examples** | You want complete runnable examples — bank support agent, email feedback graph, multi-agent flight booking | `references/examples.md` |
|
|
| **Framework boundaries** | You need to compare PydanticAI vs LangGraph for a project, or want to combine them | `references/hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md` — also load `skill_view(name='langgraph')` |
|
|
| **API surface reference** | You need to find the right import path, class name, or method signature quickly | `references/api-reference.md` |
|
|
|
|
## Common Patterns at a Glance
|
|
|
|
### Agent with tools and structured output
|
|
```python
|
|
from pydantic import BaseModel
|
|
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
|
|
|
|
class WeatherResult(BaseModel):
|
|
temperature: float
|
|
conditions: str
|
|
|
|
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-5.2', output_type=WeatherResult)
|
|
|
|
@agent.tool
|
|
async def get_weather(ctx: RunContext, city: str) -> str:
|
|
"""Get current weather for a city."""
|
|
return f"24°C and sunny in {city}"
|
|
|
|
result = agent.run_sync('Weather in London?')
|
|
print(result.output.temperature)
|
|
```
|
|
→ See `references/core-agents.md` for full agent lifecycle, run methods, and tool patterns.
|
|
|
|
### Agent with dependency injection
|
|
```python
|
|
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
|
from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext
|
|
|
|
@dataclass
|
|
class MyDeps:
|
|
api_key: str
|
|
db_conn: str
|
|
|
|
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-5.2', deps_type=MyDeps)
|
|
|
|
@agent.tool
|
|
async def query_db(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps], sql: str) -> str:
|
|
return f"Query results using {ctx.deps.db_conn}"
|
|
```
|
|
→ See `references/core-agents.md` for dependency injection patterns and testing overrides.
|
|
|
|
### Graph with multiple nodes
|
|
```python
|
|
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
|
from pydantic_graph import BaseNode, End, GraphRunContext, GraphBuilder
|
|
|
|
@dataclass
|
|
class MyState:
|
|
value: int = 0
|
|
|
|
@dataclass
|
|
class ProcessNode(BaseNode[MyState]):
|
|
async def run(self, ctx: GraphRunContext[MyState]) -> End | NextNode:
|
|
ctx.state.value += 1
|
|
if ctx.state.value >= 5:
|
|
return End(ctx.state.value)
|
|
return NextNode()
|
|
```
|
|
→ See `references/graph.md` for both BaseNode and GraphBuilder APIs, parallel execution, and join/reducer patterns.
|
|
|
|
### When to use which run method
|
|
|
|
| When you need… | Use | Key behavior |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| A single answer, sync code | `run_sync()` | Blocks until complete, returns `RunResult` |
|
|
| A single answer, async code | `run()` | Async, returns `RunResult` |
|
|
| Stream text as it's generated | `run_stream()` | Async context manager, yields `stream_text()` / `stream_output()` |
|
|
| See granular events (tool calls, part starts, deltas) | `run_stream_events()` | Yields `AgentStreamEvent` types — `FunctionToolCallEvent`, `PartStartEvent`, `FinalResultEvent` |
|
|
| Manual control over each graph step | `iter()` | Iterate over agent's internal graph nodes (`UserPromptNode` → `ModelRequestNode` → `CallToolsNode`) |
|
|
| Tool calls to execute during streaming | `run_stream_events()` or `run(event_stream_handler=...)` | `run_stream()` stops at the first output that matches `output_type` and does NOT execute subsequent tool calls |
|
|
|
|
*Details for each run method in `references/core-agents.md`.*
|
|
|
|
### Graph API: BaseNode vs GraphBuilder
|
|
|
|
| Factor | BaseNode (class-based) | GraphBuilder (function-based) |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Style | Subclass `BaseNode[StateT]`, implement `async run()` | Decorate async functions with `@g.step` |
|
|
| State mutation | Via `ctx.state` inside `run()` method | Via `ctx.state` inside step function |
|
|
| Parallelism | Manual fork/join logic | Built-in `.map()` per-element fan-out and `.broadcast()` same-input-to-multiple |
|
|
| Joins / aggregation | Manual aggregation in return types | Built-in reducers: `reduce_list_append`, `reduce_sum`, `reduce_dict_update`, etc. |
|
|
| Edge declaration | Inferred from `run()` return type annotation | Explicit via `g.edge_from(source).to(target)` |
|
|
| When to use | Complex node logic, OO patterns, conditional edge logic | Simple linear flows, parallel data processing, concise syntax |
|
|
|
|
*Both APIs in `references/graph.md`.*
|
|
|
|
### Framework boundaries: PydanticAI vs LangGraph
|
|
|
|
Both frameworks build agentic systems with graphs and tools, but they differ sharply in design philosophy. The right choice depends on what you're optimizing for.
|
|
|
|
| Factor | PydanticAI + PydanticGraph | LangGraph | Using both together |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Design philosophy | Type-safe, data-schema-driven. Feels like FastAPI. | Low-level graph primitives (Pregel/Beam inspired). Feels like NetworkX. | PydanticAI for the agent layer; LangGraph for complex orchestration |
|
|
| Agent definition | `Agent(model, tools, deps, output_type)` — declarative, one line | Manual `StateGraph` nodes with message-passing | PydanticAI `Agent` as a node function inside LangGraph `StateGraph` |
|
|
| Tool calling | `@agent.tool` decorator, auto-schema from type hints, `RunContext` DI | Manual tool registration, `tool_node = ToolNode(tools)` | PydanticAI's typed tool definitions used within LangGraph nodes |
|
|
| State management | `GraphRunContext.state` — mutable dataclass, in-memory | `State` with typed reducers, checkpointers (SQLite/Postgres) | LangGraph checkpointer for the outer flow; PydanticGraph for sub-graph state |
|
|
| Multi-agent patterns | Agent delegation (tool-call), programmatic hand-off, graph-based | Supervisor (central router), swarm (direct handoff), hierarchical (subgraphs) | PydanticAI delegation within a LangGraph supervisor node |
|
|
| Persistence | Durable execution via Temporal, Inngest, Prefect, DBOS | Built-in checkpointers (MemorySaver, SqliteSaver, PostgresSaver) | LangGraph checkpointer at graph level |
|
|
| Streaming | 5 methods: run, run_sync, run_stream, run_stream_events, iter | `.stream()` / `.astream_events()` on compiled graph | LangGraph `.astream_events()` wrapping PydanticAI event handlers |
|
|
| Learning curve | Lower — type hints guide everything | Higher — more manual wiring | Highest — two mental models |
|
|
| Best for | Single agents, tool-using workflows, type-safe structured output, teams new to agents | Complex state machines, multi-agent with branching/cycles, HITL, existing LangChain users | Large systems needing type-safe agents AND sophisticated orchestration |
|
|
|
|
**Boundary conditions — consider LangGraph when:**
|
|
- You need built-in checkpointing/persistence for long-running conversations (SQLite, Postgres backends built-in)
|
|
- Your multi-agent system needs subgraph composition with isolated state namespaces
|
|
- You need human-in-the-loop patterns (interrupt/resume, state editing, approval workflows)
|
|
- You're already using LangChain and want consistency
|
|
- Your graph needs cycles or dynamic fan-out via `Send()`
|
|
|
|
**Consider PydanticAI when:**
|
|
- Type safety and IDE autocomplete are priorities
|
|
- You want declarative agents with minimal boilerplate
|
|
- You need structured output with automatic validation and retries
|
|
- Your multi-agent needs are simple delegation or sequential hand-off
|
|
- You value the composable capabilities system (Thinking, WebSearch, MCP as plugins)
|
|
|
|
**Consider using both when:**
|
|
- You need LangGraph's orchestration (checkpointing, subgraphs, HITL) for the outer loop, but want PydanticAI's type-safe agent definition and tool schema for the inner agent logic
|
|
- You have a mixed team: some agents benefit from PydanticAI's typing, others need LangGraph's low-level control
|
|
- See `references/hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md` for a complete worked example.
|
|
|
|
*LangGraph skill:* `skill_view(name='langgraph')` — covers supervisor/swarm/hierarchical patterns, persistence, production deployment, and evals.
|
|
|
|
### Error handling quick-pick
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
from pydantic_ai import UnexpectedModelBehavior, capture_run_messages
|
|
|
|
with capture_run_messages() as messages:
|
|
try:
|
|
result = agent.run_sync('Query')
|
|
except UnexpectedModelBehavior as e:
|
|
cause = e.__cause__ # Often ModelRetry('reason')
|
|
print(f"Root cause: {cause}")
|
|
print("Full conversation:", messages) # Inspect every message
|
|
# Common recovery: raise ModelRetry from tools with clear instructions
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
| Exception | Meaning | Recovery |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| `UnexpectedModelBehavior` | Retry limit exceeded or model gave unexpected response | Inspect `e.__cause__`, check messages, adjust instructions or tool retries |
|
|
| `ModelRetry` (raised from tools) | Tool wants model to retry with different args | Let it propagate — PydanticAI handles it automatically up to `retries` limit |
|
|
| `ModelAPIError` | Provider returned 4xx/5xx | Check API key, rate limits, model availability |
|
|
| `UsageLimitExceeded` | Token/request budget exhausted | Increase `UsageLimits` or optimize prompt |
|
|
| `HookTimeoutError` | A lifecycle hook timed out | Increase hook timeout or optimize hook logic |
|
|
|
|
## Key CLI Commands
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
pip install pydantic-ai # Everything
|
|
pip install "pydantic-ai-slim[openai]" # Minimal
|
|
pip install "pydantic-ai-slim[openai,google,anthropic]" # Multi-provider
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Directory Structure
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
pydanticai/
|
|
├── SKILL.md
|
|
├── references/
|
|
│ ├── core-agents.md # Agent lifecycle, tools, deps, output
|
|
│ ├── capabilities-hooks.md # Capabilities system & lifecycle hooks
|
|
│ ├── graph.md # PydanticGraph (BaseNode + GraphBuilder)
|
|
│ ├── models-output.md # Models, streaming, structured output
|
|
│ ├── patterns.md # Multi-agent patterns & integrations
|
|
│ ├── testing-evals.md # Testing & evaluation framework
|
|
│ ├── examples.md # Complete worked examples
|
|
│ ├── hybrid-pydanticai-langgraph.md # PydanticAI as LangGraph node (hybrid pattern)
|
|
│ └── api-reference.md # Quick API surface reference
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Gotchas
|
|
|
|
- **Output type = final only:** The `output_type` constrains the *final* response. The model can still call tools (function tools) mid-run. Output functions are different — they're forced to be called and end the run.
|
|
- **pydantic-graph has zero dependency on pydantic-ai:** It's a standalone library. You can use it for non-GenAI state machines. Install with `pip install pydantic-graph`.
|
|
- **`pydantic-ai-slim` vs `pydantic-ai`:** The slim package ships only core deps + OpenTelemetry. The full `pydantic-ai` is a meta-package that adds openai, anthropic, google, cli, mcp, evals, web, retries, and logfire extras.
|
|
- **Tool calls during streaming by default DON'T execute:** `run_stream()` stops at the first output that matches the output type. Use `run_stream_events()` or `run()` with `event_stream_handler` to keep tool calls executing.
|
|
- **System prompt ≠ instructions:** System prompts are part of message history and round-trip. Instructions are server-side and don't appear in messages sent to clients. When reusing `message_history`, the agent's new system prompt won't automatically be sent unless you add `ReinjectSystemPrompt`.
|
|
- **`conversation_id` is manual for forking:** Pass `conversation_id='new'` to start a fresh conversation chain from existing history. It's not automatic.
|
|
- **Models named `provider:model_name`** — PydanticAI auto-resolves the model class from the string prefix. For custom endpoints, use `OpenAIChatModel(model_name, provider=OpenAIProvider(base_url=...))`.
|
|
- **`TestModel` can't emulate native tools:** Override with `agent.override(model=TestModel(), native_tools=[])` in tests if your agent uses WebSearch, etc.
|
|
- **`defer_model_check=True` for testable module-level agents:** When declaring an `Agent` at module level (outside a function) and using `TestModel` in tests with `agent.override(model=TestModel())`, set `defer_model_check=True` on the constructor. Without it, the agent tries to resolve the model string at import time — which fails without API credentials, even though the real model is overridden before any test runs.
|
|
- **Message history requires pairing:** When slicing history, tool calls and their returns must stay paired or the LLM will error.
|
|
- **`stream_text()` fails with BaseModel output types:** When `output_type` is a BaseModel (structured output), calling `result.stream_text()` raises `UserError('stream_text() can only be used with text responses')`. Use `result.stream_output()` instead to get partial validated objects as they stream in. If you need text-level streaming with structured output, use `run_stream_events()` and inspect `PartDeltaEvent` with `TextPartDelta` deltas. The two methods serve different output modes — text output → `stream_text()`, structured output → `stream_output()`.
|
|
- **`graph.run()` returns OutputT, NOT the state object:** Despite passing `state=MyState()` to `graph.run()`, the return value is the graph's `output_type` (e.g. `list[int]`), not the state. The `state` object IS mutated in-place during execution (since it's a mutable dataclass), so keep a separate reference:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
state = MyState(items_processed=0)
|
|
result = await graph.run(state=state, inputs=[1, 2, 3])
|
|
# result -> [2, 4, 6] (OutputT = list[int])
|
|
# state.items_processed -> 3 (state mutated in-place)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This trap is most common with parallel `.map()` patterns where the reader assumes `result.items_processed` will work. It won't. The `items_processed` count lives on the state object you passed in, not on the return value.
|