mirror of
https://github.com/magnus919/agent-skills.git
synced 2026-09-11 19:47:12 +03:00
Magnus HedemarkandGitHub
1291f9576e
* fix: SkillOpt epoch 1 for AI operating economics Promote cold-load entry points, quick-start reference routing, the minimum decision-record contract, and trigger-oriented progressive disclosure. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: SkillOpt epoch 2 for AI operating economics Add review-depth selection, evidence-to-disposition guidance, and scenario-led routing across adjacent skills. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: SkillOpt epoch 3 for AI operating economics Expose a minimum claim ledger and explicit closure conditions for every bounded disposition. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: resolve SkillOpt review consistency findings Align entry-point paths, canonical step routing, claim-ledger fields, and triage disposition wording. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: resolve final SkillOpt disposition wording Keep review-depth outputs inside the canonical disposition set and distinguish supported claims from permitted language. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: complete SkillOpt routing correction Route triage through the outcome-map step and identify the evidence-classification step explicitly. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> * fix: complete AI economics review template Add the minimum decision-record fields required by the optimized skill routing contract. Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me> --------- Signed-off-by: Magnus Hedemark <magnus919@pm.me>
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
AI Economics Review
Use this template for an executive, portfolio, experiment, launch, or lifecycle review that consumes one or more AI initiative evidence records.
Review header
- Review purpose:
- Review date:
- Operating mode: lightweight / high-assurance
- Accountable decision-maker:
- Records reviewed:
- Decision deadline or trigger:
Minimum decision record
- Intervention and population:
- Value hypothesis:
- Primary outcome:
- Countermetrics:
- Comparison and limitations:
- Cost boundary:
- Relevant slices:
- Evidence classes:
- Missing evidence, owner, and next trigger:
- Authority limit:
- Reversal path:
Executive decision
- Disposition: scale / constrain / redesign / hold / retire / exception
- Decision in one sentence:
- Approved population and workflow:
- Approved authority:
- Budget or cost boundary:
- Review trigger:
Evidence summary
| Dimension | What was observed | Confidence/class | Material caveat | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow outcome | ||||
| Quality and safety | ||||
| Worker/user/customer effect | ||||
| Adoption and substitution | ||||
| Marginal economics | ||||
| Fully loaded economics | ||||
| Reliability and operations | ||||
| Governance and authority |
Slices that change the decision
| Slice | Result | Why it matters | Required response |
|---|---|---|---|
Evidence gaps and exceptions
| Gap or exception | Consequence if wrong | Owner | Control or containment | Revisit date/trigger |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Options and trade-offs
| Option | Value evidence | Cost | Quality/worker/user effects | Authority and reversibility | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Decision record
- Why this disposition is justified:
- What would falsify or reverse it:
- What will not be claimed:
- Next action:
- Named owner:
- Verification evidence required before the next authority or investment step: