Close the unnamed-focal-moment gap; unstutter the inverse-failure lead

Cursor's finding was real: gating the density check on a named focal
moment let a busy comp pass whenever the direction named none, which is
the common case on the lane that produced the busy comps. The second leg
reuses the bullet's own distinction: several regions performing the
concept at once is the same shout; regions doing their jobs are not.

AI-assisted (Claude Fable 5).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

skill/reference/visualize.md

@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ The purpose of a probe is to test composition, narrative, hierarchy, density, fo
 Render three distinct high-fidelity north-star comps of the requested surface, with whatever generation capability exists, saved under `.impeccable/mocks/` so they survive the session. Comp at the surface's own viewport: portrait at device size for a native app or mobile-first surface, desktop landscape otherwise; a phone screen comped landscape misstates the composition before anything gets built against it. Comps are the build thread's own work, never delegated: the thread that writes the comp prompts holds the direction's full context, and it has already seen every comp when the build starts. Open every image you produce or reference by its workspace-relative path, never an absolute one: sandboxed viewers reject absolute paths, and everything under the project root has a relative path. Base them on the real content and the surface concepts already developed with the user. Three is the number: one comp invites rubber-stamping, and the spread between three is what surfaces the composition worth building. The chosen card's decision comp is the first of the three: it already renders this direction at full fidelity under this file's discipline, so this round generates two more that vary what the first held fixed, and all three go to the approval point together. Only a round that arrives with no decision comp, a degraded roll, an identity-mode page, a direction pinned without the decision round, renders all three here.
 
 - A comp is a designed surface, not a picture of the subject. Lead the generation prompt with the surface's own structure, whatever regions this design actually has, named in order with their scale relationships; a page with no navigation states that instead of inventing one, and an unconventional surface states its unconventional skeleton. A prompt that leads with the world's atmosphere gets a vignette back: the model paints the fish market instead of the fish market's website. Self-check every render: if it could hang as a poster, or reads as a photograph or scene with some text on it, it is not a comp; regenerate with the layout scaffold stated more literally.
-- The inverse failure fails too: a surface with none of its subject in it. The subject appears as the content the regions exist to hold; the world dresses the frame and never displaces what the frame exists to show. The deletion usually rides in on the prompt's exclusion list, so exclusions bind invented claims, and a medium ban belongs to the committed imagery stance, never to caution. Before accepting a render, point at the subject: a render that depicts everything about the world and nothing of the subject fails however faithful its atmosphere, so regenerate with the subject's content named region by region.
+- The inverse is also a failure: a surface with none of its subject in it. The subject appears as the content the regions exist to hold; the world dresses the frame and never displaces what the frame exists to show. The deletion usually rides in on the prompt's exclusion list, so exclusions bind invented claims, and a medium ban belongs to the committed imagery stance, never to caution. Before accepting a render, point at the subject: a render that depicts everything about the world and nothing of the subject fails however faithful its atmosphere, so regenerate with the subject's content named region by region.
 - A comp is judged as the shipped screen: the visitor's job must be readable from the image alone. Name the surface's mode from the render with no caption; a render whose mode cannot be read back is art direction without a surface, so regenerate with the visitor's job as the prompt's spine.
-- Commitment is depth, not coverage. The world enters through one dominant move plus the material, type, and spacing that support it, and the remaining regions hold still so that move can be read; a region that simply does its job in the world's own grammar carries the direction further than a region performing the concept. The check cuts competition, never content: a quieted region keeps its information and stops performing. Where the direction names a focal moment, a second element competing with it at the same scale means the comp is shouting; regenerate keeping the strongest move and quieting the rest. Busy is louder, not bolder.
+- Commitment is depth, not coverage. The world enters through one dominant move plus the material, type, and spacing that support it, and the remaining regions hold still so that move can be read; a region that simply does its job in the world's own grammar carries the direction further than a region performing the concept. The check cuts competition, never content: a quieted region keeps its information and stops performing. Where the direction names a focal moment, a second element competing with it at the same scale means the comp is shouting; where it names none, several regions performing the concept at once is the same shout. Regenerate keeping the strongest move and quieting the rest. Busy is louder, not bolder.
 - When the user shortlisted multiple concepts, spread the three across them.
 - When one direction is committed, vary the structural uncertainty an image can resolve: topology, sequence, density, hierarchy, focal composition, or interaction framing.
 - Show enough beyond the opening moment to prove the concept can govern the whole requested surface.