skills/pbakaus_impeccable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable.git synced 2026-09-11 21:57:14 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

COMP-FIDELITY: final human verdicts on sweeps 6-7

Browse Source 
AI-assisted (Claude Code).
This commit is contained in:
Paul Bakaus
2026-08-28 06:13:59 +05:00
committed by Abdul Wahab
parent 38170564c6
commit 866bd94b7e
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/COMP-FIDELITY.md
+6 -4
View File
@@ -197,12 +197,12 @@ Paul reviewed every sweep-3/4/5 build against its comp on a click-to-annotate pa
| verdict | comp-diff overall of those samples |
|---|---|
| pass (2) | 73 (opus main 05), 70 (opus branch 11) |
| pass (4) | 73 (opus main 05), 70 (opus branch 11), **80 (opus branch 05, sweep 7: "by far the best result so far")**, 68 (opus branch 07, sweep 7: "borderline pass") |
| "pass except one bug" (1) | 86 (opus branch 05: cover arch clipped by its box) |
| unsure (9) | 61-74 |
| fail (20) | 43-68 |
| unsure (10) | 61-74 |
| fail (27) | 43-68 |
So the human pass line sits at about 70-73 on comp-diff, and `HERO_MIN` at 0.72 is inside it. Every main build was a fail except one opus sample; branch builds were the only ones rated pass or unsure on 07 and 11.
So the human pass line sits at about 68-73 on comp-diff, and `HERO_MIN` at 0.72 is inside it. Every main build was a fail except one opus sample; branch builds were the only ones rated pass or unsure on 07 and 11, and the sweep-7 opus builds (with the readings from this review) hold three of the four passes.
The pins, grouped, and what each became:
@@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ The pins, grouped, and what each became:
| chart lines less dense (1) | not mechanised (a chart drawn in code) |
| "arguably better" deviations: a colour that fixes contrast, a label moved (3) | by design: the contract wins at the hero; a stated second pass after it may change it |
| a note by the model itself: "the grid boxes straddle two elements, CSS cannot fix the structure penalty" | it was right: text and control regions now snap to the largest ink mass in their span |
| "bad asset crop (crops are never allowed)" (2) | plates gate refuses a file that resamples the comp region (structure 95%+ against the raw crop) |
| "letter spacing way too wide" (1) | tracking reading (glyph gap in cap units) |
Two verdict boundaries the review drew: close-enough icon glyphs are acceptable; arrows, chevrons, dropdown chrome, and control borders and fills are the comp's (controls are held like text at the hero now).