Text fallback presents surviving challengers as alternates

The structured-tool channel collapsed to a single direction plus
re-roll, which read as "the system only ever offers one idea" next to
the multi-card decision page. Both channels now share one structure,
assigned direction leading, the one or two fused challengers that
survived the weighing as named alternates, re-roll with steer, and
differ only in richness. The anti-lineup rule stays precise: what never
appears is a ranked menu of the model's own grounded candidates; dealt
challengers carry no ranking rut.

Note: dist rebuild deliberately deferred; the release-gate campaign is
running against the pinned dist and rebuilding mid-run aborts it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Bakaus
2026-07-22 12:23:06 -07:00
co-authored by Claude Fable 5
parent 386f9883cf
commit 9dade04bbf
+1 -1
View File
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ The script assigns which structure gets built: your top-ranked structure is what
2. From that cultural world, list seven concrete visual systems, artifacts, places, or rituals the audience knows by heart, each with one line on why it resonates and can carry the mechanism, ordered by resonance. The audience's world includes its graphic and screen traditions, the notation, publications, identity programs, data graphics, and interfaces it reads daily, not only its physical objects; a nameable abstract system (a school of poster, a documentation standard, a data-graphic tradition) is as concrete a candidate as any artifact. What would this thing look like as a physical object; what did its world look like before the web? Near-duplicates count once. When more than three of the seven share one material family, the derivation stopped at the subject's most obvious artifact; the audience's world is larger than that, so dig until the list spans at least three families.
3. Turn that material into complete directions: each joins a reusable visual world to a concrete first-surface experience.
4. Run `node {{scripts_path}}/concept-seed.mjs --scope direction --mode <mode>` and follow what it prints. The script assigns which direction gets built and deals catalog challengers. Fuse each challenger before judging it: the challenger supplies the form and its system grammar, the product supplies every fact, and clarity wins conflicts. Weigh fused challengers against the assigned direction on exactly two axes, audience identification and product clarity; losing to strong grounded material is a valid outcome, and beating a thin or tool-monoculture list is the point. <!-- rule:skill-concept-procedure -->
5. Present one direction, fully committed: its world, first viewport, visitor path, signature interaction, cross-surface reach, and honest risk. Offer re-roll with an optional one-line steer instead of a ranked menu; a lineup invites the safest card. Re-roll eliminates every direction already shown, grounded and challenger alike; after two consecutive re-rolls, ask what quality is missing. You may re-roll on your own only on named factual grounds, when the assigned direction cannot carry the product's truth or task; taste is never grounds. The user may re-roll freely, and a user- or brief-pinned direction beats the roll, always. <!-- rule:skill-assigned-plus-reroll --> Pick the channel by capability, not by habit: can you put a page in front of the user, through an in-app browser or by opening a browser window on their machine outside your harness? If yes, present the decision visually: write an options payload with the assigned direction leading, the dealt challengers as alternates carrying their QUALITY BAR cards, and re-roll plus steer enabled; a degraded roll with no challengers still uses the page, as a single text-only card with re-roll, then run `node {{scripts_path}}/serve-question.mjs --start --payload <file>` (run it with `--schema` first for the exact payload shape). It daemonizes, prints the page URL and a key, and exits immediately; now open that URL for the user, preferring the in-app browser when the harness has one, then the system opener, then showing the URL. Collect the choice with `--wait --key <key>`, repeating while it exits 3; the ANSWER prints as JSON. Exit 4 means the page was closed without an answer: re-present once through the structured question tool, and with no answer there either, proceed unattended with the assigned direction and state the assumptions. A harness that can leave a shell blocked in the background may instead run the script without `--start` and let it auto-open and block. If no, because the session is headless, CI, an eval worker, or a remote shell with no display, skip the page and put the same decision through the structured question tool; the script self-detects these environments and exits 2 with that advice, so treat exit 2 as this fallback, never as an error to retry. <!-- rule:skill-visual-decision-page -->
5. Present one direction, fully committed: its world, first viewport, visitor path, signature interaction, cross-surface reach, and honest risk. Alongside it, offer the one or two fused challengers that survived the weighing as named alternates with a one-line case each, plus re-roll with an optional one-line steer. What you never present is a ranked menu of your own grounded candidates; a lineup of those invites the safest card, while dealt challengers carry no such rut. The two channels share this structure and differ only in richness: cards and boards on the decision page, names and one-liners through the structured tool. Re-roll eliminates every direction already shown, grounded and challenger alike; after two consecutive re-rolls, ask what quality is missing. You may re-roll on your own only on named factual grounds, when the assigned direction cannot carry the product's truth or task; taste is never grounds. The user may re-roll freely, and a user- or brief-pinned direction beats the roll, always. <!-- rule:skill-assigned-plus-reroll --> Pick the channel by capability, not by habit: can you put a page in front of the user, through an in-app browser or by opening a browser window on their machine outside your harness? If yes, present the decision visually: write an options payload with the assigned direction leading, the dealt challengers as alternates carrying their QUALITY BAR cards, and re-roll plus steer enabled; a degraded roll with no challengers still uses the page, as a single text-only card with re-roll, then run `node {{scripts_path}}/serve-question.mjs --start --payload <file>` (run it with `--schema` first for the exact payload shape). It daemonizes, prints the page URL and a key, and exits immediately; now open that URL for the user, preferring the in-app browser when the harness has one, then the system opener, then showing the URL. Collect the choice with `--wait --key <key>`, repeating while it exits 3; the ANSWER prints as JSON. Exit 4 means the page was closed without an answer: re-present once through the structured question tool, and with no answer there either, proceed unattended with the assigned direction and state the assumptions. A harness that can leave a shell blocked in the background may instead run the script without `--start` and let it auto-open and block. If no, because the session is headless, CI, an eval worker, or a remote shell with no display, skip the page and put the same decision through the structured question tool; the script self-detects these environments and exits 2 with that advice, so treat exit 2 as this fallback, never as an error to retry. <!-- rule:skill-visual-decision-page -->
Catalog worlds are working systems, not mood references. When one survives, carry its palette and material, type and composition, topology, controls and state, and responsive rules into the product. When the source is itself an interface language, commit to its native grammar across navigation, content, controls, and states. When the harness can view images, open the QUALITY BAR board and hero the seed prints for the world you build (when it only reads local images, download the card to a temp file first and view that): they set the craft level the build must reach, the finish, commitment, and art direction of a rendered reference, and never dictate the composition; your surface serves this product.