Files
pbakaus_impeccable/docs/COMP-GATE-INTEGRITY.md
T
Paul Bakaus 91a4df5093 Fix comp gate evidence and stale plate approvals
Measure declared region bounds, keep raw and effective verdicts distinct,
and use active blockers for repair feedback. Revalidate plate receipts
against current asset, region, and comp hashes; require an explicit quoted
comp-authority downgrade for force overrides.

Add regressions for missing assets, copied comp pixels, repeated failures,
generic delegation, and stale reports. Preserve fidelity thresholds.

AI assistance: implemented and validated with OpenAI Codex.
2026-09-11 13:39:42 -07:00

64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown

# Comp gate evidence and integrity
Comp fidelity still has two independent requirements: the numeric score and the
absence of blocking findings. A high overall score, a repeated attempt, or an
existing plate file does not satisfy a missing-region check.
## Measurements and decisions
`comp-diff` measures the declared region bounds. It does not enlarge a narrow
region to include neighbouring elements. Coverage and region-kind checks remain
the responsibility of `comp-spec`; this change does not authorize omitting
regions or shrinking their bounds to exclude required work.
A standalone `comp-diff` report contains raw verdicts. The hero gate can interpret
those measurements using current plate validation and rendered presence. For
hero evidence:
- `raw-report.json` retains uninterpreted metrics and verdicts.
- `report.json` retains the same scores, adds `rawVerdict` to each region, and
publishes the effective `verdict` used by the gate and paired image label.
- `gate.ok` and `gate.reasons` describe whether advancement is allowed and all
unresolved blockers. `drift` alone does not mean a region is nonblocking.
- Paired images label their gate status as `BLOCKING`, `NONBLOCKING`, or
`CHECK GATE`, using the same report fields.
- Region-specific blockers are recorded as `blockingReasons`. `blocking: null`
means an unscoped blocking finding prevents attributing a clean bill of health
to that region. Unscoped findings remain in `gate.unscopedReasons`; they are
not hidden or waived.
When capture, spec, or plate validation fails before measurement, the current
report has `measurementsAvailable: false`, no region results, and the failed
gate reasons. It does not present the preceding capture as current evidence.
Stall feedback follows repeated blocking reasons. It never chooses an asset to
regenerate solely because that asset has the lowest raw score. The feedback is
additional context; it does not clear a finding or advance the phase.
## Plate validation
Successful plate receipts include SHA-256 fingerprints of the asset bytes,
measured region, and comp. A changed or deleted file, a changed region, or a
changed comp invalidates the receipt. Legacy score-only receipts are revalidated.
An invalid plate cannot receive an `ok` receipt merely because its PNG decoded.
Rendered presence is still checked after asset validation, so a file hidden in
the page does not count as placed.
## Overrides
A `--force --reason` must contain a direct quoted downgrade of comp authority
attributed to the user. Generic delegation, the builder's surrounding claim that
it may proceed, or a gate exception does not establish that authorization.
The quote parser is deliberately conservative. It cannot authenticate a quote:
the calling harness must retain the actual user answer and assess provenance.
Neither local receipts nor caller-written state are a security boundary against
an agent with arbitrary write access to all files and engine code.
## Validation
The comp-verbs regressions cover narrow-region isolation, changed/deleted plate
receipts, comp-crop reuse, hidden rendered assets, repeated failed attempts,
ambiguous overrides, spec coverage and kind refusals, and raw/effective report
agreement. They do not certify semantic equivalence of arbitrary artwork or
justify relaxing a fidelity threshold.