The probe asked whether node could load ESM, while the notice promised a
Node 22 floor and package.json engines declares >=22.12.0. Reviewers kept
flagging the gap, and they were right to: a 14.18-to-21 runtime passed the
probe on the strength of one import while the hook and its detector bundle
are only ever exercised on the engines floor, so "can load our code" was a
weaker claim than the one being made for it.
Check the floor directly: parseInt(process.versions.node) >= 22, in
ES5-only syntax that parses on any node old enough to fail it. Probe and
notice now derive from one NODE_MAJOR_FLOOR constant, so they cannot
disagree, and the archaeology about node: scheme support and pre-15
unhandled-rejection semantics goes with the import it explained.
Add the missing contract test: every generated hook command carries the
probe, the notice appears exactly where a harness can render it (Claude
and Codex, project and plugin), and the expected floor is read from
package.json engines rather than repeated by hand.
Verified against a fake pre-22 node, no node, and a real node: one notice
then the marker holds it silent, exit 0 in every failure shape, and the
hook's own exit code still passes through on a supported runtime.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 (via Cursor) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Greptile flagged that the probe does not enforce the Node 22 engines floor.
Two parts to that, and they land differently.
The real defect is narrower and worse than stated: the hook closure imports
`node:fs`, `node:os`, `node:path` and `node:url`, and the `node:` scheme needs
14.18, so a bare `import('fs')` probe passed on 12 and 13 and those runtimes
then died on the real import, which is the banner this branch exists to remove.
Probing `node:fs` closes that. The added `.catch(()=>process.exit(1))` is load
bearing rather than tidiness: before Node 15 an unhandled rejection is only a
warning and the process still exits 0, so a rejected probe would have read as a
pass on exactly the versions in question.
Not enforcing 22 is deliberate and stays. The probe asks whether this runtime
can load our code, not whether it is a supported one, so a 14.18-to-21 runtime
that works today keeps working rather than being silently switched off. The
notice names 22 because that is the version worth installing, and it only ever
reaches someone whose runtime already failed the probe, so no user is shown a
threshold that contradicts what ran.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The hook command invokes bare `node`. When that node predates ESM,
`hook.mjs` dies while it is still being parsed, before the script's own
always-exit-0 contract can run, so node exits 1 and the harness reports a
hook error on every Stop and every edit.
Probe the runtime in the command string before invoking the hook, and
route the Claude plugin manifest through the guard that already covered
the project-local manifests. On probe failure the command exits 0 and
emits a one-time `systemMessage` naming the two fixes available to the
user, since nothing written in ESM can report this condition.
Fixes#410.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bump plugin + marketplace to 4.0.1 and sync the regenerated provider
output: the guarded hook commands from issue #399 (a missing hook file
exits 0 instead of crashing every turn of a user-level install), the
canon standing exit, the visualize flow, the two shipped subagents, and
the interactive-spine fixes from today's live testing. Detector count
validates at 59 with undersized-ui-text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>